On 16/12/12 22:23, D. R. Newman wrote:
> On 26/10/12 09:22, Tim Phipps wrote:
>
>> My contribution to MythTV is here:
>>
>> http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Commercial_detection_with_silence_for_UK_freeviewHD
> I tried this, it often works well, but it is not doing the same as
> mythcommflag_wrapper, as it ignores the minimum time for silence.
So I have written mausc2.c (attached) which takes the minimum silence
into the logic.
However, I wonder if it would be better to simply spit out of mausc the
periods of silence, then do the logic working out which bits are adverts
and which bits are programme in python?
David Newman
> On 26/10/12 09:22, Tim Phipps wrote:
>
>> My contribution to MythTV is here:
>>
>> http://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Commercial_detection_with_silence_for_UK_freeviewHD
> I tried this, it often works well, but it is not doing the same as
> mythcommflag_wrapper, as it ignores the minimum time for silence.
So I have written mausc2.c (attached) which takes the minimum silence
into the logic.
However, I wonder if it would be better to simply spit out of mausc the
periods of silence, then do the logic working out which bits are adverts
and which bits are programme in python?
David Newman