On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Yes, strictly speaking this would save you one. However, if you also
> want firewalling then it saves you two, since you don't need to set up
> a second machine as your firewall.
Use proxyarp with private addresses on the interfaces. A broken config,
yes, but it will save you adresses.
While you're at it, ask your provider about IPv6 support, which will
remove the need for such broken things like NAT.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> Yes, strictly speaking this would save you one. However, if you also
> want firewalling then it saves you two, since you don't need to set up
> a second machine as your firewall.
Use proxyarp with private addresses on the interfaces. A broken config,
yes, but it will save you adresses.
While you're at it, ask your provider about IPv6 support, which will
remove the need for such broken things like NAT.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/