pgollucci@apache.org wrote:
> Author: pgollucci
> Date: Tue Sep 20 12:49:58 2005
> New Revision: 290549
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290549&view=rev
> Log:
> fix
> bin/build -f
>
> ----------------------------------------
> File: asf/perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod
> spurious '>' at <input text> line 4779
> spurious '>' at <input text> line 4779
>
>
>
> Modified:
> perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod
>
> Modified: perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod?rev=290549&r1=290548&r2=290549&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod (original)
> +++ perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod Tue Sep 20 12:49:58 2005
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
>
> If you are going to write your own benchmarking utility, use the
> C<Benchmark> module and the C<Time::HiRes> module where you need
> -better time precision (<10msec).
> +better time precision (less than 10msec).
>
> An example of the C<Benchmark.pm> module usage:
So these two were the cause of the problem? I wonder why we haven't
received those "bugs" in first place? It used to work just fine.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://mailchannels.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org
> Author: pgollucci
> Date: Tue Sep 20 12:49:58 2005
> New Revision: 290549
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=290549&view=rev
> Log:
> fix
> bin/build -f
>
> ----------------------------------------
> File: asf/perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod
> spurious '>' at <input text> line 4779
> spurious '>' at <input text> line 4779
>
>
>
> Modified:
> perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod
>
> Modified: perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod?rev=290549&r1=290548&r2=290549&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod (original)
> +++ perl/modperl/docs/trunk/src/docs/1.0/guide/performance.pod Tue Sep 20 12:49:58 2005
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
>
> If you are going to write your own benchmarking utility, use the
> C<Benchmark> module and the C<Time::HiRes> module where you need
> -better time precision (<10msec).
> +better time precision (less than 10msec).
>
> An example of the C<Benchmark.pm> module usage:
So these two were the cause of the problem? I wonder why we haven't
received those "bugs" in first place? It used to work just fine.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://mailchannels.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org