On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, pgollucci@apache.org wrote:
> Author: pgollucci
> Date: Thu Sep 1 21:44:13 2005
> New Revision: 266284
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=266284&view=rev
> Log:
> s/my(/my (/g
[ ... ]
That's really great to make all of these consistent;
that was a lot of work!
However, in a few places like
> -C<my()> vs. C<use vars>:
> +C<my ()> vs. C<use vars>:
I find the usage of 'my ()' a bit confusing, compared
to 'my()', when used in the context of denoting a
function. I guess this preference is a bit inconsistent,
as I also prefer this change:
> - my( $class, $text ) = @_ ;
> + my ( $class, $text ) = @_ ;
--
best regards,
randy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org
> Author: pgollucci
> Date: Thu Sep 1 21:44:13 2005
> New Revision: 266284
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=266284&view=rev
> Log:
> s/my(/my (/g
[ ... ]
That's really great to make all of these consistent;
that was a lot of work!
However, in a few places like
> -C<my()> vs. C<use vars>:
> +C<my ()> vs. C<use vars>:
I find the usage of 'my ()' a bit confusing, compared
to 'my()', when used in the context of denoting a
function. I guess this preference is a bit inconsistent,
as I also prefer this change:
> - my( $class, $text ) = @_ ;
> + my ( $class, $text ) = @_ ;
--
best regards,
randy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@perl.apache.org