Mailing List Archive: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

Mar 26, 2021, 7:10 PM

Post #1 of 16 (1553 views)

I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8

I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
your best judgement.

Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:

* Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
* All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
Blocker
* All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
the current release branch.
* Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
a release candidate build.

Thanks,
Mike

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

ichattopadhyaya at gmail

Mar 26, 2021, 9:11 PM

Post #2 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Hi Mike,

I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but will
likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to
the festival of Holi)

Regards,
Ishan

On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:

> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>
> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
> your best judgement.
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
> Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> the current release branch.
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
> a release candidate build.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

mdrob at mdrob

Mar 27, 2021, 7:23 AM

Post #3 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Ishan,

Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.

I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.

Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.

Mike

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
> to the festival of Holi)
>
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>
>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>> your best judgement.
>>
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>> Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>> the current release branch.
>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>> delay
>> a release candidate build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

iverase at gmail

Mar 29, 2021, 1:47 AM

Post #4 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
only touches one class tho so very low risk.
lucene

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:

> Ishan,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>> to the festival of Holi)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>
>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>>> your best judgement.
>>>
>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>
>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>> Blocker
>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>> the current release branch.
>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>> delay
>>> a release candidate build.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

casstargett at gmail

Mar 29, 2021, 6:30 AM

Post #5 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

You mentioned maybe re-publishing the Ref Guide in one of the issues, do you still want to do that? If so, I should backport URL changes for the project split (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15212) - it won’t be a problem for me to do that before the end of this week.
On Mar 29, 2021, 3:47 AM -0500, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com>, wrote:
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> lucene
>
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> > > Ishan,
> > >
> > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
> > >
> > > I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> > >
> > > Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival of Holi)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ishan
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your best judgement.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> > > > > > > why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> > > > > > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> > > > > > > in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
> > > > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> > > > > > > to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> > > > > > > the current release branch.
> > > > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
> > > > > > > a release candidate build.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Mike

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

romseygeek at gmail

Mar 29, 2021, 10:31 AM

Post #6 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Hi Mike,

I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).

Thanks, Alan

> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com <mailto:iverase@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> lucene
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com <mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>> wrote:
> Ishan,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288> in, but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival of Holi)
>
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com <mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>> wrote:
> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>
> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your best judgement.
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> the current release branch.
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
> a release candidate build.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

mdrob at mdrob

Mar 29, 2021, 10:55 AM

Post #7 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to
backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update
CHANGES entry as well.

Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>
> Thanks, Alan
>
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> lucene
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
>> Ishan,
>>
>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
>> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>
>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>
>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>>> to the festival of Holi)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ishan
>>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>>
>>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>>>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>>>> your best judgement.
>>>>
>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>
>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>> Blocker
>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>> the current release branch.
>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>> delay
>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

tomasflobbe at gmail

Mar 29, 2021, 11:18 AM

Post #8 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Mike,
I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix)

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:

> Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to
> backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update
> CHANGES entry as well.
>
> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>
>> Thanks, Alan
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>> lucene
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ishan,
>>>
>>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week
>>> to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>>
>>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>>
>>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>>>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>>>> to the festival of Holi)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ishan
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If
>>>>> you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so
>>>>> using your best judgement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>>> Blocker
>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>>>>> committed
>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>>> the current release branch.
>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>>> delay
>>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

casstargett at gmail

Mar 29, 2021, 11:30 AM

Post #9 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.

Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and building, etc.
On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>
> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
> >
> > Thanks, Alan
> >
> > > On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> > >
> > > lucene
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> > > > Ishan,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
> > > >
> > > > I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> > > >
> > > > Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival of Holi)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ishan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your best judgement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> > > > > >   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> > > > > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> > > > > >   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
> > > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> > > > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> > > > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
> > > > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Mike
> >

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

mdrob at mdrob

Mar 29, 2021, 12:23 PM

Post #10 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

I feel kind of weird about this one, is there a slightly less minimal patch
that is still reasonably safe and would let us continue to avoid
problematic terminology?

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:18 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe <tomasflobbe@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Mike,
> I'd like to backport SOLR-15216 (UI Fix)
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:55 AM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
>> Ignacio, Alan - I have looked at the patches and these should be safe to
>> backport and useful in a bugfix. Please go ahead and commit, and update
>> CHANGES entry as well.
>>
>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>>
>>> Thanks, Alan
>>>
>>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>> lucene
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ishan,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week
>>>> to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>>>
>>>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>>>
>>>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>>>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in,
>>>>> but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now
>>>>> due to the festival of Holi)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ishan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If
>>>>>> you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so
>>>>>> using your best judgement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>>>>> Blocker
>>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>>>>>> committed
>>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>>>>> the current release branch.
>>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>>>>> delay
>>>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

mdrob at mdrob

Mar 29, 2021, 12:25 PM

Post #11 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there
were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some
changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on
how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads
up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>
> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build
> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the
> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and
> building, etc.
> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>
>
> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com
> <https://mailto:romseygeek@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>
> Thanks, Alan
>
> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com
> <https://mailto:iverase@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>
> lucene
>
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com
> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>> wrote:
>
> Ishan,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>
> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>
> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <https://mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
> to the festival of Holi)
>
> Regards,
> Ishan
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com
> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>> wrote:
>
> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>
> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
> your best judgement.
>
> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>
> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
> Blocker
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> the current release branch.
> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
> a release candidate build.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

casstargett at gmail

Mar 29, 2021, 1:32 PM

Post #12 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!

I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d like to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only, though.
On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
> > >
> > > Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and building, etc.
> > > On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, Alan
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lucene
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Ishan,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi Mike,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival of Holi)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Ishan
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your best judgement.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
> > > > > > > > >   why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
> > > > > > > > > * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
> > > > > > > > >   in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
> > > > > > > > > * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
> > > > > > > > >   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
> > > > > > > > >   the current release branch.
> > > > > > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
> > > > > > > > >   a release candidate build.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Mike
> > > > >

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

iverase at gmail

Mar 30, 2021, 1:03 AM

Post #13 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

Hi Mike,

LUCENE-9870 has been backported, Thanks!

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:32 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch
> instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on
> that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!
>
> I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d
> like to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only,
> though.
> On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>
> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there
> were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some
> changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on
> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads
> up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build
>> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the
>> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and
>> building, etc.
>> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>>
>>
>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com
>> <https://mailto:romseygeek@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>
>> Thanks, Alan
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com
>> <https://mailto:iverase@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>
>> lucene
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com
>> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Ishan,
>>
>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to
>> accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>
>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>
>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <https://mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>> to the festival of Holi)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com
>> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>
>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>> your best judgement.
>>
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>> Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>> the current release branch.
>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>> delay
>> a release candidate build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

romseygeek at gmail

Mar 30, 2021, 4:26 AM

Post #14 of 16 (1553 views)

Permalink

LUCENE-9744 and LUCENE-9762 are both backported.

> On 30 Mar 2021, at 09:03, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com <mailto:iverase@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> LUCENE-9870 has been backported, Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:32 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com <mailto:casstargett@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!
>
> I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d like to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only, though.
> On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com <mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>>, wrote:
>> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com <mailto:casstargett@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and building, etc.
>> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com <mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com>>, wrote:
>>
>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com <https://mailto:romseygeek@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>
>> Thanks, Alan
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com <https://mailto:iverase@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>
>> lucene
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>> Ishan,
>>
>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>
>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>
>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <https://mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288> in, but will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due to the festival of Holi)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ishan
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>
>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using your best judgement.
>>
>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>
>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as Blocker
>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>> the current release branch.
>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will delay
>> a release candidate build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

mdrob at mdrob

Apr 6, 2021, 8:17 AM

Post #15 of 16 (1529 views)

Permalink

I am going to start building the 8.8.2 RCs and running some tests locally
before the vote. Please hold on further commits to branch_8_8, or let me
know that I need to restart the builds if we find something critical in the
next few hours.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:26 AM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com> wrote:

> LUCENE-9744 and LUCENE-9762 are both backported.
>
> On 30 Mar 2021, at 09:03, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> LUCENE-9870 has been backported, Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:32 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from scratch
>> instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no worries on
>> that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!
>>
>> I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided I’d
>> like to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s docs-only,
>> though.
>> On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that there
>> were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be some
>> changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate further on
>> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a heads
>> up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett <casstargett@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The build
>>> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the
>>> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about contributing and
>>> building, etc.
>>> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise is
>>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some gradle->ant
>>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more order to it?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com
>>> <https://mailto:romseygeek@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>>
>>> Thanks, Alan
>>>
>>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com
>>> <https://mailto:iverase@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that
>>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>>
>>> lucene
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com
>>> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ishan,
>>>
>>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra week
>>> to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others) coming up.
>>>
>>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>>
>>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com <https://mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com/>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, but
>>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right now due
>>> to the festival of Holi)
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ishan
>>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com
>>> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>
>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If you
>>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do so using
>>> your best judgement.
>>>
>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>
>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as
>>> Blocker
>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>>> the current release branch.
>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker" will
>>> delay
>>> a release candidate build.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 [ In reply to ]

uwe at thetaphi

Apr 6, 2021, 8:49 AM

Post #16 of 16 (1529 views)

Permalink

I will reenable Jenkins.

Uwe

Am April 6, 2021 3:17:03 PM UTC schrieb Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>:
>I am going to start building the 8.8.2 RCs and running some tests
>locally
>before the vote. Please hold on further commits to branch_8_8, or let
>me
>know that I need to restart the builds if we find something critical in
>the
>next few hours.
>
>On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:26 AM Alan Woodward <romseygeek@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> LUCENE-9744 and LUCENE-9762 are both backported.
>>
>> On 30 Mar 2021, at 09:03, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> LUCENE-9870 has been backported, Thanks!
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:32 PM Cassandra Targett
><casstargett@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, I see what you meant! I actually just redid the changes from
>scratch
>>> instead of trying to backport the 9.0 changes as a patch, so no
>worries on
>>> that front. Thanks for thinking of me there though!
>>>
>>> I just committed some changes for morelikethis.adoc that I decided
>I’d
>>> like to backport into branch_8_8 since we’re re-publishing…it’s
>docs-only,
>>> though.
>>> On Mar 29, 2021, 2:25 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>, wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks, Cassandra. When I skimmed the initial changeset, I saw that
>there
>>> were changes to build.gradle - I assumed that there would have to be
>some
>>> changes to build.xml in the 8x branch, but I didn't investigate
>further on
>>> how they would differ. Was just trying to be helpful and give you a
>heads
>>> up about it, but looks like I caused more confusion than help!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:31 PM Cassandra Targett
><casstargett@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I pushed up the URL changes I mentioned.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what you mean, Mike, by “gradle->ant translation”? The
>build
>>>> process is different in branch_8x but it’s documented in the
>>>> how-to-contribute page in the ref guide that talks about
>contributing and
>>>> building, etc.
>>>> On Mar 29, 2021, 12:55 PM -0500, Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com>,
>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cassandra - yes, I plan to republish the ref guide, your expertise
>is
>>>> absolutely appreciated. It looks like there will also be some
>gradle->ant
>>>> translation. Was this mostly find-and-replace or was there more
>order to it?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:32 PM Alan Woodward
><romseygeek@gmail.com
>>>> <https://mailto:romseygeek@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals
>>>> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Alan
>>>>
>>>> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera <iverase@gmail.com
>>>> <https://mailto:iverase@gmail.com/>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries
>that
>>>> causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix
>>>> only touches one class tho so very low risk.
>>>>
>>>> lucene
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob <mdrob@mdrob.com
>>>> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ishan,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfortable delaying an extra
>week
>>>> to accommodate the multitude of holidays (Holi, Passover, others)
>coming up.
>>>>
>>>> I will adjust my schedule to start the vote Tuesday, Apr 6.
>>>>
>>>> Please make sure that all back ports are appropriately marked with
>>>> fixVersion in Jira and have corresponding CHANGES entries.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:11 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>> ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com
><https://mailto:ichattopadhyaya@gmail.com/>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> I wish to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in,
>but
>>>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right
>now due
>>>> to the festival of Holi)
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ishan
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:41 am Mike Drob, <mdrob@mdrob.com
>>>> <https://mailto:mdrob@mdrob.com/>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_8_8
>>>>
>>>> I plan to have the RC built and vote started on Tuesday, Mar 30. If
>you
>>>> have small, low risk bug fixes to backport before then, please do
>so using
>>>> your best judgement.
>>>>
>>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch:
>>>>
>>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue
>>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take.
>>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 8.8.2
>>>> in JIRA, and issues that should delay the release must be marked
>as
>>>> Blocker
>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be
>committed
>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then
>into
>>>> the current release branch.
>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.8.2 and priority "Blocker"
>will
>>>> delay
>>>> a release candidate build.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de