Hi!
In SLES11 SP3 I feel that the message in new in crm (I haven't noticed it in the past):
INFO: object cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07 cannot be represented in the CLI notation
The constraint seems to be created by crm migrate itself! That makes it interesting!
crm(live)configure# show cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07
xml <rsc_location id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07" rsc="grp_c11_db" role="Started"> \
<rule id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07-rule" score="-INFINITY"> \
<expression id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07-expr" attribute="#uname" operation="eq" value="h07"/> \
<date_expression id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07-lifetime" operation="lt" end="2014-07-11 18:29:12Z"/> \
</rule> \
</rsc_location>
crmsh-1.2.6-0.33.1
Regards,
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
In SLES11 SP3 I feel that the message in new in crm (I haven't noticed it in the past):
INFO: object cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07 cannot be represented in the CLI notation
The constraint seems to be created by crm migrate itself! That makes it interesting!
crm(live)configure# show cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07
xml <rsc_location id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07" rsc="grp_c11_db" role="Started"> \
<rule id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07-rule" score="-INFINITY"> \
<expression id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07-expr" attribute="#uname" operation="eq" value="h07"/> \
<date_expression id="cli-ban-grp_c11_db-on-h07-lifetime" operation="lt" end="2014-07-11 18:29:12Z"/> \
</rule> \
</rsc_location>
crmsh-1.2.6-0.33.1
Regards,
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems