Done.
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> 2013-1-22 ä¸Šåˆ 4:20 >>>
Hi John,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:23:05AM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> Medium: tools: ocft: update to version 0.44
>
> Added "incremental" mode (ocft test -i) , cache results and
> not repeatedly rerun those cases which succeeded.
>
> Improved *ocft make*, the ocft will only make the updated test-case file.
>
> The ocft test prints the actual case names instead of just case numbers.
Can you please split the patch into several self-contained
patches, each of which fixes a single issue.
Great work!
Thanks,
Dejan
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic <dejan@suse.de> 2013-1-22 ä¸Šåˆ 4:20 >>>
Hi John,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:23:05AM -0700, John Shi wrote:
> Medium: tools: ocft: update to version 0.44
>
> Added "incremental" mode (ocft test -i) , cache results and
> not repeatedly rerun those cases which succeeded.
>
> Improved *ocft make*, the ocft will only make the updated test-case file.
>
> The ocft test prints the actual case names instead of just case numbers.
Can you please split the patch into several self-contained
patches, each of which fixes a single issue.
Great work!
Thanks,
Dejan
> _______________________________________________________
> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/