Hi Dejan
How do you think about a patch of this tomcat?
The following patches want more you to look.
This is a patch of the changes by a process check, but speaks the
reason that I want to change.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/75839#77203
Regards,
Tomo
---------- $BE>Aw%a%C%;!<%8(B ----------
From: nozawat <nozawat@gmail.com>
$BF|IU(B: 2011$BG/(B12$B7n(B12$BF|(B18:23
$B7oL>(B: [PATCH]Comment for tomcat-ra and status-action and correction of
the parameter check
To: High-Availability Linux Development List <linux-ha-dev@lists.linux-ha.org>
Hi
I made the following modifications in tomcat-ra.
1.tomcat-001.patch
The default had a description to be called root in the comment of
the tomcat_user parameter.
However, I deleted the comment because there was not the default in root.
2.tomcat-002.patch
I made modifications now because nothing did the status action to
carry out a monitor.
3.tomcat-003.patch
I added a check of JAVA_HOME and CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE
like jboss-ra.
Regards,
Tomo
How do you think about a patch of this tomcat?
The following patches want more you to look.
This is a patch of the changes by a process check, but speaks the
reason that I want to change.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/dev/75839#77203
Regards,
Tomo
---------- $BE>Aw%a%C%;!<%8(B ----------
From: nozawat <nozawat@gmail.com>
$BF|IU(B: 2011$BG/(B12$B7n(B12$BF|(B18:23
$B7oL>(B: [PATCH]Comment for tomcat-ra and status-action and correction of
the parameter check
To: High-Availability Linux Development List <linux-ha-dev@lists.linux-ha.org>
Hi
I made the following modifications in tomcat-ra.
1.tomcat-001.patch
The default had a description to be called root in the comment of
the tomcat_user parameter.
However, I deleted the comment because there was not the default in root.
2.tomcat-002.patch
I made modifications now because nothing did the status action to
carry out a monitor.
3.tomcat-003.patch
I added a check of JAVA_HOME and CATALINA_HOME and CATALINA_BASE
like jboss-ra.
Regards,
Tomo