Mailing List Archive

On Thu, 2006-04-06 14:37:33 +0800, Sumit Narayan <talk2sumit@gmail.com> wrote:
> Shouldn't the superblock be changed/deleted once the partition is
> deleted? I tried a reboot, but the output remained the same.

No, everything you see is "works as expected." A partition is only a
container (as well as "disks", "volume groups", "RAID arrays",
"logical volumes", "image files" etc. are.)

Whenever you destroy such a container, its contents isn't modified (or
deleted) or otherwise modified. So it's perfectly okay to delete such
a container (eg. remove start and end from the partition table) and
recreate it at some time later (by adding those values back to the
partition table.) As long as the new container starts at the same
location, a filesystem driver will be able to find the old
information. If you start a block later, it won't find it's
superblocks.

Finally, you have several choices how to defeat getting back old data.
Most probably, you'd just zero it out before deleting the partition
with something like:

# cat /dev/zero > /dev/hda3

(of course with the correct device name!)

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Sumit Narayan wrote:

> On my system, I first created a partition with EXT3 and put some data
> on it. Later, I deleted the partition, and re-created another
> partition with the same starting block number and a higher ending
> block number. I intended to format it with another filesystem, but
> surprisingly (or maybe just to me), the superblock of the partition
> had not changed. I could still mount the new partition as the same old
> filesystem. I could see all the files which was present earlier. Doing
> 'df' showed me the older partition details (size, % used etc.).
>
> Shouldn't the superblock be changed/deleted once the partition is
> deleted? I tried a reboot, but the output remained the same.

This is the expected behavior. A filesystem is created within the
partition. If you grow the partition, the filesystem doesn't
automatically grow (use resize2fs for that). In fact, you should
probably read the resize2fs manpage, as it might give you some starting
clue of what's going on.

Damian Menscher
--
-=#| <menscher@uiuc.edu> www.uiuc.edu/~menscher/ Ofc:(650)253-2757 |#=-
-=#| The above opinions are not necessarily those of my employers. |#=-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

>deleted) or otherwise modified. So it's perfectly okay to delete such
>a container (eg. remove start and end from the partition table) and
>recreate it at some time later (by adding those values back to the
>partition table.) As long as the new container starts at the same
>location, a filesystem driver will be able to find the old
>information. If you start a block later, it won't find it's
>superblocks.
>
If using a filesystem with replicated superblocks (ext*, xfs), then ...?
[Includes expecting weird breakage.]



Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

On Mon, 2006-04-10 17:28:18 +0200, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> >deleted) or otherwise modified. So it's perfectly okay to delete such
> >a container (eg. remove start and end from the partition table) and
> >recreate it at some time later (by adding those values back to the
> >partition table.) As long as the new container starts at the same
> >location, a filesystem driver will be able to find the old
> >information. If you start a block later, it won't find it's
> >superblocks.
> >
> If using a filesystem with replicated superblocks (ext*, xfs), then ...?
> [Includes expecting weird breakage.]

I'll possibly test if this works in another life...

MfG, JBG

--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));