* Coywolf Qi Hunt (coywolf@gmail.com) wrote:
> I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow
> since the security stable came.
It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes
sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel
stability.
> Now on the kernel.org page, we have 2.6.13.3 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one
> wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but
> 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I
> suggest we name 2.6.13.3 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable".
Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> I find the kernel.org first page inconvenient for some people somehow
> since the security stable came.
It's stable, not security stable. It does contain security fixes
sometimes, but it is generally about patches that improve kernel
stability.
> Now on the kernel.org page, we have 2.6.13.3 and 2.6.14-rc3. If one
> wants to get 2.6.14-rc3, he shouldn't get 2.6.14-rc3 Full, but
> 2.6.14-rc3 Patch and 2.6.13 Full, which isn't there unfortunately. I
> suggest we name 2.6.13.3 "security stable", and 2.6.13 "stable".
Perhaps a column B for base. Or just link to ketchup and be done with it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/