Mailing List Archive

[PATCH v4 29/71] x86/cpu/intel: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines
New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 3c3e7e5695ba..b85afd5d6128 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -72,19 +72,19 @@ static bool cpu_model_supports_sld __ro_after_init;
*/
static void check_memory_type_self_snoop_errata(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
- switch (c->x86_model) {
- case INTEL_FAM6_CORE_YONAH:
- case INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_MEROM:
- case INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_MEROM_L:
- case INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_PENRYN:
- case INTEL_FAM6_CORE2_DUNNINGTON:
- case INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM:
- case INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_G:
- case INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_EP:
- case INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM_EX:
- case INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE:
- case INTEL_FAM6_WESTMERE_EP:
- case INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE:
+ switch (c->x86_vfm) {
+ case INTEL_CORE_YONAH:
+ case INTEL_CORE2_MEROM:
+ case INTEL_CORE2_MEROM_L:
+ case INTEL_CORE2_PENRYN:
+ case INTEL_CORE2_DUNNINGTON:
+ case INTEL_NEHALEM:
+ case INTEL_NEHALEM_G:
+ case INTEL_NEHALEM_EP:
+ case INTEL_NEHALEM_EX:
+ case INTEL_WESTMERE:
+ case INTEL_WESTMERE_EP:
+ case INTEL_SANDYBRIDGE:
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_SELFSNOOP);
}
}
@@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ static void probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
*/
if (c->x86 != 6)
return;
- switch (c->x86_model) {
- case INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNL:
- case INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNM:
+ switch (c->x86_vfm) {
+ case INTEL_XEON_PHI_KNL:
+ case INTEL_XEON_PHI_KNM:
break;
default:
return;
@@ -134,34 +134,41 @@ static void probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* - Release note from 20180108 microcode release
*/
struct sku_microcode {
- u8 model;
+ u32 vfm;
u8 stepping;
u32 microcode;
};
static const struct sku_microcode spectre_bad_microcodes[] = {
- { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE, 0x0B, 0x80 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE, 0x0A, 0x80 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE, 0x09, 0x80 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L, 0x0A, 0x80 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_L, 0x09, 0x80 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X, 0x03, 0x0100013e },
- { INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X, 0x04, 0x0200003c },
- { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL, 0x04, 0x28 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_G, 0x01, 0x1b },
- { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D, 0x02, 0x14 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D, 0x03, 0x07000011 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X, 0x01, 0x0b000025 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_L, 0x01, 0x21 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_G, 0x01, 0x18 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL, 0x03, 0x23 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X, 0x02, 0x3b },
- { INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X, 0x04, 0x10 },
- { INTEL_FAM6_IVYBRIDGE_X, 0x04, 0x42a },
+ { INTEL_KABYLAKE, 0x0B, 0x80 },
+ { INTEL_KABYLAKE, 0x0A, 0x80 },
+ { INTEL_KABYLAKE, 0x09, 0x80 },
+ { INTEL_KABYLAKE_L, 0x0A, 0x80 },
+ { INTEL_KABYLAKE_L, 0x09, 0x80 },
+ { INTEL_SKYLAKE_X, 0x03, 0x0100013e },
+ { INTEL_SKYLAKE_X, 0x04, 0x0200003c },
+ { INTEL_BROADWELL, 0x04, 0x28 },
+ { INTEL_BROADWELL_G, 0x01, 0x1b },
+ { INTEL_BROADWELL_D, 0x02, 0x14 },
+ { INTEL_BROADWELL_D, 0x03, 0x07000011 },
+ { INTEL_BROADWELL_X, 0x01, 0x0b000025 },
+ { INTEL_HASWELL_L, 0x01, 0x21 },
+ { INTEL_HASWELL_G, 0x01, 0x18 },
+ { INTEL_HASWELL, 0x03, 0x23 },
+ { INTEL_HASWELL_X, 0x02, 0x3b },
+ { INTEL_HASWELL_X, 0x04, 0x10 },
+ { INTEL_IVYBRIDGE_X, 0x04, 0x42a },
/* Observed in the wild */
- { INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE_X, 0x06, 0x61b },
- { INTEL_FAM6_SANDYBRIDGE_X, 0x07, 0x712 },
+ { INTEL_SANDYBRIDGE_X, 0x06, 0x61b },
+ { INTEL_SANDYBRIDGE_X, 0x07, 0x712 },
};

+static bool vfm_match(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 vfm)
+{
+ return c->x86_vendor == VFM_VENDOR(vfm) &&
+ c->x86 == VFM_FAMILY(vfm) &&
+ c->x86_model == VFM_MODEL(vfm);
+}
+
static bool bad_spectre_microcode(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
int i;
@@ -173,11 +180,8 @@ static bool bad_spectre_microcode(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
return false;

- if (c->x86 != 6)
- return false;
-
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spectre_bad_microcodes); i++) {
- if (c->x86_model == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].model &&
+ if (vfm_match(c, spectre_bad_microcodes[i].vfm) &&
c->x86_stepping == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].stepping)
return (c->microcode <= spectre_bad_microcodes[i].microcode);
}
@@ -313,7 +317,7 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* need the microcode to have already been loaded... so if it is
* not, recommend a BIOS update and disable large pages.
*/
- if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == 0x1c && c->x86_stepping <= 2 &&
+ if (c->x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_BONNELL && c->x86_stepping <= 2 &&
c->microcode < 0x20e) {
pr_warn("Atom PSE erratum detected, BIOS microcode update recommended\n");
clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PSE);
@@ -346,11 +350,11 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)

/* Penwell and Cloverview have the TSC which doesn't sleep on S3 */
if (c->x86 == 6) {
- switch (c->x86_model) {
- case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SALTWELL_MID:
- case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SALTWELL_TABLET:
- case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID:
- case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT_NP:
+ switch (c->x86_vfm) {
+ case INTEL_ATOM_SALTWELL_MID:
+ case INTEL_ATOM_SALTWELL_TABLET:
+ case INTEL_ATOM_SILVERMONT_MID:
+ case INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT_NP:
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC_S3);
break;
default:
@@ -394,7 +398,7 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* should be false so that __flush_tlb_all() causes CR3 instead of CR4.PGE
* to be modified.
*/
- if (c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model == 9) {
+ if (c->x86_vfm == INTEL_QUARK_X1000) {
pr_info("Disabling PGE capability bit\n");
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_PGE);
}
@@ -626,12 +630,13 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_PEBS);
}

- if (c->x86 == 6 && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH) &&
- (c->x86_model == 29 || c->x86_model == 46 || c->x86_model == 47))
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH) &&
+ (c->x86_vfm == INTEL_CORE2_DUNNINGTON ||
+ c->x86_vfm == INTEL_NEHALEM_EX ||
+ c->x86_vfm == INTEL_WESTMERE_EX))
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR);

- if (c->x86 == 6 && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) &&
- ((c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT)))
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) && c->x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_GOLDMONT)
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_MONITOR);

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -1247,9 +1252,9 @@ void handle_bus_lock(struct pt_regs *regs)
* feature even though they do not enumerate IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES.
*/
static const struct x86_cpu_id split_lock_cpu_ids[] __initconst = {
- X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_X, 0),
- X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_L, 0),
- X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_D, 0),
+ X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ICELAKE_X, 0),
+ X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ICELAKE_L, 0),
+ X86_MATCH_VFM(INTEL_ICELAKE_D, 0),
{}
};

--
2.44.0
Re: [PATCH v4 29/71] x86/cpu/intel: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines [ In reply to ]
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:15:08AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> +static bool vfm_match(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 vfm)
> +{
> + return c->x86_vendor == VFM_VENDOR(vfm) &&
> + c->x86 == VFM_FAMILY(vfm) &&
> + c->x86_model == VFM_MODEL(vfm);
> +}

Why is that one here?

It looks generic enough to put it in asm/processor.h so that it can get
used elsewhere too instead of homegrowing things again...

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
RE: [PATCH v4 29/71] x86/cpu/intel: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines [ In reply to ]
> > +static bool vfm_match(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 vfm)
> > +{
> > + return c->x86_vendor == VFM_VENDOR(vfm) &&
> > + c->x86 == VFM_FAMILY(vfm) &&
> > + c->x86_model == VFM_MODEL(vfm);
> > +}
>
> Why is that one here?
>
> It looks generic enough to put it in asm/processor.h so that it can get
> used elsewhere too instead of homegrowing things again...

Looking at it now in the context of where this patch series ended, it looks
to be superfluous. It just reduces to:

static bool vfm_match(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 vfm)
{
return c->x86_vfm == vfm;
}

But since it is only used in one place, I should just do that test inline without
a helper:

if (c->x86_vfm == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].vfm &&
c->x86_stepping == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].stepping)
return (c->microcode <= spectre_bad_microcodes[i].microcode);

-Tony
Re: [PATCH v4 29/71] x86/cpu/intel: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines [ In reply to ]
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 04:29:37PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> But since it is only used in one place, I should just do that test inline without
> a helper:
>
> if (c->x86_vfm == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].vfm &&
> c->x86_stepping == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].stepping)
> return (c->microcode <= spectre_bad_microcodes[i].microcode);

Right.

Thx.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette