Mailing List Archive

Masanari,

On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Masanari Iida wrote:

> Subject : [PATCH] [linux-next] x86/smpboot: Remove duplicate inclusion of
> asm/reammode.h

The "linux-next" tag is pointless. The duplicate include is in Linus tree
as well, so this is not linux-next specific at all.

Please be more careful with your subject lines. reammode.h ????

> This patch remove duplicate asm/realmode.h in smpboot.c

Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. Especially the
following paragraph:

Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy to
do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change its
behaviour

"This patch" is really pointless. We already know that this is a patch,
otherwise you wouldn't have sent it with the "[PATCH]" prefix in the
subject line.

> Confirm successfully compile after remove the line.

That's obvious, isn't it? If the include is duplicate the removal won't
break anything.

> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
>
> # Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
> # with '#' will be kept; you may remove them yourself if you want to.
> # An empty message aborts the commit.
> # On branch smpboot-fix
> # Changes to be committed:
> # modified: arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> #

Please adjust your workflow. This is not part of a changelog. It's the
comment section of the git-commit template which should not be part of your
patch submission at all.

Thanks,

tglx