Mailing List Archive

gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error
Hello,

OS is as follow: RH 70, Kernel 2.4test8 GCC 2.96, GLIBC 2.1.91
Compile time is as follow:

CFLAGS=”-static -O3 –march=i686 –funroll-loops –fomit-frame-pointer” \
./configure \
--prefix=/usr \
--mandir=/usr/share/man \
--enable-static-rnd=linux \
--disable-nls \
--disable-shared


Compilation and installation success without problem.
The make check command return the following error: "expect" needed but
not found - test skipped / All tests passed

Now the problem is that I get the following errors from --gen-key:

gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error
gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error
Please select what kind of key you want:


Please cc to my address as I am not subscribed.

Thank you,

--
/ / Gerhard Mourani

"Open Network Architecture" <http://www.openna.com/>
"Securing & Optimizing Linux: Red Hat Edition"
<http://www.linuxports.com/>
"Securing & Optimizing Linux: Red Hat Edition"
<http://www.linuxcentral.com/>
"Securing & Optimizing Linux: Red Hat Edition"
<http://www.linuxsecurity.com/>


--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
Re: gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error [ In reply to ]
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes:

> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Gerhard Mourani wrote:
>
> > OS is as follow: RH 70, Kernel 2.4test8 GCC 2.96, GLIBC 2.1.91
> ^^^^^^^^
> Isn't that a pure development snapshot version?

It's the compiler shipped with RHL7... a heavily patched snapshot.
Further details, flames, and commentary available at any Linux news
site.

--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors!
30 days, 23 hours, 19 minutes, 42 seconds till we run away.
You will be run over by a beer truck.

--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
Re: gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error [ In reply to ]
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Gerhard Mourani wrote:

> OS is as follow: RH 70, Kernel 2.4test8 GCC 2.96, GLIBC 2.1.91
^^^^^^^^
Isn't that a pure development snapshot version?

> gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error

Hmmm, do you have set an empty keyring filename?

Run it under strace -e file



--
Werner Koch GnuPG key: 621CC013
OpenIT GmbH http://www.OpenIT.de

--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
Re: gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error [ In reply to ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Werner Koch wrote:

> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:24:16 +0200
> From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> Cc: Gerhard Mourani <gmourani@openna.com>
> Subject: Re: gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error
> Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 18:24:57 +0200
> Resent-From: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Gerhard Mourani wrote:
>
> > OS is as follow: RH 70, Kernel 2.4test8 GCC 2.96, GLIBC 2.1.91
> ^^^^^^^^
> Isn't that a pure development snapshot version?

Yes, and RedHat is shipping it!! The Gcc steering committee gave them
some heat about it. It produces 'C++' object files incompatible
with gcc-2.x or gcc-3.x. One of HeadRat's many blunders in the 7.0 release.

- --
"The Funk, the whole Funk, and nothing but the Funk."
Linux barcode software mirror: http://dadadada.net/cuecat
Billy Donahue <mailto:billy@dadadada.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope 2.9.0 - http://pgpenvelope.sourceforge.net/

iD8DBQE55Jjw+2VvpwIZdF0RAi13AJ9RrxkuDfYFQK6Gn7CM8cQgZ2HbmQCdE/dy
XyOtFBX1xHvarHtLeCM0WYE=
=6N3c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
Re: gpg: keyblock resource `/root/.gnupg': file open error [ In reply to ]
At 06:24 PM 10/11/00 +0200, you wrote:

(oops, sorry Werner, I meant to send this to the group instead of
you the first time!) :-)

>> OS is as follow: RH 70, Kernel 2.4test8 GCC 2.96, GLIBC 2.1.91
> ^^^^^^^^
>Isn't that a pure development snapshot version?

The 2.4 kernel that ships with RH 7.0 is not stable.

And the GCC 2.96 is not quite kosher either.

They recommend using the KGCC compiler for your kernel,
so perhaps using kgcc for GPG is a good idea as well?

Rich...
________________________________________
The Central New York Linux User Group
Now with one of them web page thingies!
www.cnylug.org <-> rich@cnylug.org

--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org