Mailing List Archive

Still problems with kmail 1.0.x and gpg
hello...

1st of all, to whom it may concern ;-)
thank you VERY much for your fine work with both kde1 and kde2, last not least
gnupg !

but now for the bad news... i successfully applied and compiled your patch for
gpg-support with kmail 1.0.x. encrypting works well. encrypting and signing
works well. only signing a message doesn't work.

kmail-Bug#3843: marked as done (GPG: Sending a mail with a bad password do not
encrypt) is not included in the patch, right ? (and my knowledge to c is to
limited for me to merge it...)

but, in my opinion, "worst of all" is the fact that kmail doesn't decrypt
encrypted mails nor does it check signed ones :-( is this hard to implement /
merge from 1.1x ? can anyone confirm this ?

i am using debian-slink, gnu-pg1.0.1, kde1.1.2-19990906.

or do all _stable_ kmail-users have to wait for kde2 to get intregated
cryptography in kde/kmail ?


bye,
holgi


p.s.: you can get the kmail-gpg-patch at
http://devel-home.kde.org/~kmail/download.html

p.p.s.: i am not aware if i am allowed to post to kde-kmail@lists.kde.org...
Re: Still problems with kmail 1.0.x and gpg [ In reply to ]
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Stefan Taferner wrote:

> Of course everybody is welcome to integrate latest KMail changes back
> into the stable KMail 1.0.29+ :-)

si - but i am not able to do this :-(

so that's why i started this thread here. maybe someone who reads this has the
ability to do it and actually has the resources to do it ;-)

> > as you may have read between the lines i better like (and/or have) to use
> > stable versions. if kmail1.1.x is stable, fine. but i think it is not
> > possible to install kde1.1.x and kde2 (only the libraries) together on the
> > same system, is it ? if it's possible, this could be a solution. i don't
> > think kde-1.9.2 as a whole is as stable as i want ;)
> It is possible.

really, that's great. i thought it was not...

> The only problem might be the config files, as they are not 100% up- and
> downwards compatible. So yo would need to switch the ~/.kde directory
> tree if you want to switch back from Kde-2 to Kde-1.

since it's only one application this isn't to bad. kmail-files (.index) didn't
change ?

> Use Pgp2.x meanwhile.
> It works fine with your version of KMail, and it's license is also not too
> strict, IMO.

yes, but you can't communicate with someone who only has new
pgp5/gpg-style keys... :-(


ciao,
holgi

--
"I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's too
young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10
or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say 'Daddy, where were you
when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?' " -Mike Godwin