Mailing List Archive

gnupg rpms
If someone wants to try, I've packaged gpg 0.4.2 in rpm format; the binary
one is built on i386 redhat 5.1 box.

Just a question: optimizations like -m486 can be used safely with gpg or
there are some risks?
this binary is compiled with standard "plain configure" options.

the URL is:
ftp://felix/pub/RPMS/gnupg-0.4.2-fl2.i386.rpm
ftp://felix/pub/RPMS/gnupg-0.4.2-fl2.src.rpm
ftp://felix/pub/RPMS/gnupg.spec


--
Fabio Coatti cova@felix.unife.it
2:332/409.414 Fidonet
http://felix.unife.it/~cova Home page
Old SysOps never die... they simply forget their password.
Re: gnupg rpms [ In reply to ]
On Tue, Oct 20, 1998 at 02:16:13PM +0200, Fabio Coatti wrote:
>
> the URL is:
> ftp://felix/pub/RPMS/gnupg-0.4.2-fl2.i386.rpm
> ftp://felix/pub/RPMS/gnupg-0.4.2-fl2.src.rpm
> ftp://felix/pub/RPMS/gnupg.spec
>

whops...the domain :-)

ftp://felix.unife.it/pub/RPMS/gnupg-0.4.2-fl2.i386.rpm
ftp://felix.unife.it/pub/RPMS/gnupg-0.4.2-fl2.src.rpm
ftp://felix.unife.it/pub/RPMS/gnupg.spec




--
Fabio Coatti cova@felix.unife.it
2:332/409.414 Fidonet
http://felix.unife.it/~cova Home page
Old SysOps never die... they simply forget their password.
Re: gnupg rpms [ In reply to ]
Fabio Coatti <cova@felix.unife.it> writes:

> Just a question: optimizations like -m486 can be used safely with gpg or
> there are some risks?

Why not "make check" should find that out. (I know that is runs on a
486).