I recently installed gentoo-x86_64 on my athlon64 based laptop. I
compiled my own custom kernel-2.6.8-r4 gentoo kernel. I initially
compiled the msdos, fat, vfat and ntfs drivers into the kernel. But for
some reason I wasn't able to mount my windows FAT32 partition. mount
kept returning the following message:
# mount /dev/hda4 /mnt/cdrom
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda4,
or too many mounted file systems
I am able to mount my NTFS partition which happens to be /dev/hda1. I
then recompiled my kernel and included the above file-system drivers are
modules, but still get the same error when trying to mount the VFAT
partition. Here's what my lsmod says:
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
ntfs 84328 0
vfat 11776 0
msdos 7808 0
fat 41280 2 vfat,msdos
nvidia 5289876 14
psmouse 22604 0
I have run scandisk in Windows on the FAT32 partition to make sure there
weren't any real filesystem problems and scandisk did not find anything
wrong with that partition. Has anybody else encountered a similar
problem ? Any suggestions as to why this is failing ?
srinivas
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
compiled my own custom kernel-2.6.8-r4 gentoo kernel. I initially
compiled the msdos, fat, vfat and ntfs drivers into the kernel. But for
some reason I wasn't able to mount my windows FAT32 partition. mount
kept returning the following message:
# mount /dev/hda4 /mnt/cdrom
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda4,
or too many mounted file systems
I am able to mount my NTFS partition which happens to be /dev/hda1. I
then recompiled my kernel and included the above file-system drivers are
modules, but still get the same error when trying to mount the VFAT
partition. Here's what my lsmod says:
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
ntfs 84328 0
vfat 11776 0
msdos 7808 0
fat 41280 2 vfat,msdos
nvidia 5289876 14
psmouse 22604 0
I have run scandisk in Windows on the FAT32 partition to make sure there
weren't any real filesystem problems and scandisk did not find anything
wrong with that partition. Has anybody else encountered a similar
problem ? Any suggestions as to why this is failing ?
srinivas
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list