-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 12:01, Khan wrote:
> >>WTF not using apache2?
> >
> > Yes, a wise decision IMHO.
>
> I don't think so. I dont think that PHP Community still doesn't
> recommend Apache2 and PHP.
Probably foolishly, but without looking at the documentation, I believe the
core of php is perfectly thread safe, but third party modules may not be, so
they urge caution.
The only third party modules I know of are php-accelerator, and the like.
Also, there is no reason why apache2 has to run in multi-threaded mode, Gentoo
defaults to multi-process, so there is *NO* reason why PHP may be unsafe.
- --
Mike Williams
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBPZpYInuLMrk7bIwRApGRAJoCQRa2TKVW2hNLPUseBU7px/VuHQCdE4IO
qMbd91PndzJW+MBEGOY4BW0=
=6HCR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 September 2004 12:01, Khan wrote:
> >>WTF not using apache2?
> >
> > Yes, a wise decision IMHO.
>
> I don't think so. I dont think that PHP Community still doesn't
> recommend Apache2 and PHP.
Probably foolishly, but without looking at the documentation, I believe the
core of php is perfectly thread safe, but third party modules may not be, so
they urge caution.
The only third party modules I know of are php-accelerator, and the like.
Also, there is no reason why apache2 has to run in multi-threaded mode, Gentoo
defaults to multi-process, so there is *NO* reason why PHP may be unsafe.
- --
Mike Williams
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBPZpYInuLMrk7bIwRApGRAJoCQRa2TKVW2hNLPUseBU7px/VuHQCdE4IO
qMbd91PndzJW+MBEGOY4BW0=
=6HCR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list