Mailing List Archive

Think I found the issue.

Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.

-matt

On 4/11/06, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> While trying to emerge gcc I got the following error:
>
> !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 failed.
> Call stack:
> ebuild.sh, line 1585: Called source
> '/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild'
> gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild, line 36: Called inherit 'toolchain' 'eutils'
> ebuild.sh, line 1342: Called die
>
> !!! died sourcing
> /opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass in
> inherit()
> !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
> stack if relevant.
>
>
> aux_get(): (0) Error in sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 ebuild. (1)
> Check for syntax error or corruption in the ebuild. (--debug)
>
> !!! EBUILD_PHASE=depend
> !!! D=/opt/portage/Apr7/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2-r3/image/opt/portage/Apr7
> !!! DEST=
> !!! PREFIX=
> !!! ROOT=/opt/portage/Apr7
> /opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass: line
> 1540: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
> /opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass: line
> 1540: ` fi'
>
> Another regression?
>
> -matt
>

--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> Think I found the issue.
>
> Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.

Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)


--
Fabian Groffen

--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Is this SVN tree available publicly?

On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> > Think I found the issue.
> >
> > Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.
>
> Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)
>
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
>
> --
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

On 11-04-2006 13:20:27 -0700, m h wrote:
> Is this SVN tree available publicly?

Not that I know. Only through the snapshots.


> On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> > > Think I found the issue.
> > >
> > > Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.
> >
> > Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)

--
Fabian Groffen
--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).

(Note that we want to roll back everything we can....)

On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 11-04-2006 13:20:27 -0700, m h wrote:
> > Is this SVN tree available publicly?
>
> Not that I know. Only through the snapshots.
>
>
> > On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> > > > Think I found the issue.
> > > >
> > > > Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.
> > >
> > > Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> --
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote:
> Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
> guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).

I'm looking for a similar solution, and I'm not sure yet. Ideally all
should be centralised, but I'm affraid that's not going to happen.
--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Grobian wrote:
> On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote:
> > Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
> > guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).
>
> I'm looking for a similar solution, and I'm not sure yet. Ideally all
> should be centralised, but I'm affraid that's not going to happen.

Distributed would be a bit better here...

Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to subversion
so merge history can be preserved...

(that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).
~harring

On 4/11/06, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Grobian wrote:
> > On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote:
> > > Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
> > > guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).
> >
> > I'm looking for a similar solution, and I'm not sure yet. Ideally all
> > should be centralised, but I'm affraid that's not going to happen.
>
> Distributed would be a bit better here...
>
> Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to subversion
> so merge history can be preserved...
>
> (that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).

Would it be worthwhile to set up a berlios or sourceforge project? I
think something like trac would be nice. I'd like to file bugs and be
able to browse changes to the source tree.

--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

On 11-04-2006 22:35:06 -0700, m h wrote:
> On 4/11/06, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Distributed would be a bit better here...
> >
> > Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to subversion
> > so merge history can be preserved...
> >
> > (that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).
>
> Would it be worthwhile to set up a berlios or sourceforge project? I
> think something like trac would be nice. I'd like to file bugs and be
> able to browse changes to the source tree.

I would favour sourceforge. They have SVN, and I probably will keep on
having access to it then as well as any other non-gentoo developer that
wants to join.


--
Fabian Groffen
--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Hey everyone, sorry I'll be out of the loop until about the 7th of
may. Work, moving, and family are keeping me waaaaay to busy until then.

On Apr 12, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Grobian wrote:

> On 11-04-2006 22:35:06 -0700, m h wrote:
>> On 4/11/06, Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Distributed would be a bit better here...
>>>
>>> Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to
>>> subversion
>>> so merge history can be preserved...
>>>
>>> (that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).
>>
>> Would it be worthwhile to set up a berlios or sourceforge project? I
>> think something like trac would be nice. I'd like to file bugs
>> and be
>> able to browse changes to the source tree.
>
> I would favour sourceforge. They have SVN, and I probably will
> keep on
> having access to it then as well as any other non-gentoo developer
> that
> wants to join.

I just finished setting up svn and trac on one of my colo machines
for work. After work calms down, I'd be happy to set something up
there if everyone wants that. I'm really starting to like trac(and
coincidentally hate bugzilla), and for our humble few users I have no
problem footing the bill for bandwidth. It would also be nice and
probably more efficient to be able to give people like matt commit
access without having to go through the rigamorole of becoming a
Gentoo dev.

I'll catch up on bugs and mails when I get back, I know there are
tons and exg and myself left the svn in a broken state. I promise
I'll fix them all up ASAP.


--Kito




--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list