Hello!
I see that more and more ebuilds use -fno-PIE and -fno-pie (both)
1. Should we not make some arch dependent usage of these (built into gcc)?
I need info about the different archs, which one should be used (the same
as -fPIC / -fpic)
2. It would be more correct to use nopie, this will also disable the use
of the PIC built crt start and endfile, else I should add -fno-PIE and
-fno-pie to the crtfile selection too (this happens if some package calls
directly ld, not through gcc)
Peter
--
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
____________________________________________________________________
Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol.
Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu
--
gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list
I see that more and more ebuilds use -fno-PIE and -fno-pie (both)
1. Should we not make some arch dependent usage of these (built into gcc)?
I need info about the different archs, which one should be used (the same
as -fPIC / -fpic)
2. It would be more correct to use nopie, this will also disable the use
of the PIC built crt start and endfile, else I should add -fno-PIE and
-fno-pie to the crtfile selection too (this happens if some package calls
directly ld, not through gcc)
Peter
--
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
____________________________________________________________________
Miert fizetsz az internetert? Korlatlan, ingyenes internet hozzaferes a FreeStarttol.
Probald ki most! http://www.freestart.hu
--
gentoo-hardened@gentoo.org mailing list