Xavier Neys wrote:
> Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Xavier has put up a nice fix for our XSL/DTD files that allow our
>> users to
>> quickly find the printable document of the page they are viewing.
>> Interested
>> readers should point their webbrowser to
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64052
>>
>> The DTD will now require (instead of allow) the use of the link attribute
>> inside the <guide> and <book> tags, so
>>
>> <guide link="name-of-the-document.xml">
>> is now mandatory. Xavier has nicely added "backwards compatibility"
>> so that
>> documents who don't contain this link attribute still function. The
>> problem
>> we face is that some documents do contain a link attribute, but with a
>> wrong
>> value. This may lead to incorrect printable documents or even internal
>> server errors.
>>
>> Can the languages please check their documents if they contain a
>> (correct) link
>> attribute:
The updated list of docs with an invalid link is at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~neysx/badlinks.txt
I have just fixed many docs all over /doc/ and made them DTD compliant at the
same time.
Please check that I did not screw up your docs, especially non-latin alphabet
ones. You may slap me with a fish if I did ;-)
The following invalid docs are still in need of attention (or retirement)
./doc/ja/portage-user.xml
./doc/ja/build.xml
./doc/ru/gentoo-pda.xml
./doc/ru/gentoo-hppa-install.xml
./doc/ru/gentoo-x86-install.xml
./doc/ru/lvm.xml
With kind regards,
--
/ Xavier Neys
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project
/ French & Internationalisation Lead
\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en
/\
> Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Xavier has put up a nice fix for our XSL/DTD files that allow our
>> users to
>> quickly find the printable document of the page they are viewing.
>> Interested
>> readers should point their webbrowser to
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64052
>>
>> The DTD will now require (instead of allow) the use of the link attribute
>> inside the <guide> and <book> tags, so
>>
>> <guide link="name-of-the-document.xml">
>> is now mandatory. Xavier has nicely added "backwards compatibility"
>> so that
>> documents who don't contain this link attribute still function. The
>> problem
>> we face is that some documents do contain a link attribute, but with a
>> wrong
>> value. This may lead to incorrect printable documents or even internal
>> server errors.
>>
>> Can the languages please check their documents if they contain a
>> (correct) link
>> attribute:
The updated list of docs with an invalid link is at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~neysx/badlinks.txt
I have just fixed many docs all over /doc/ and made them DTD compliant at the
same time.
Please check that I did not screw up your docs, especially non-latin alphabet
ones. You may slap me with a fish if I did ;-)
The following invalid docs are still in need of attention (or retirement)
./doc/ja/portage-user.xml
./doc/ja/build.xml
./doc/ru/gentoo-pda.xml
./doc/ru/gentoo-hppa-install.xml
./doc/ru/gentoo-x86-install.xml
./doc/ru/lvm.xml
With kind regards,
--
/ Xavier Neys
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project
/ French & Internationalisation Lead
\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en
/\