On 12/06/10 12:24, Joshua Saddler (nightmorph) wrote:
> +<impo>
> +The exception to this rule is<path>/doc/en/metadoc.xml</path>. Metadoc should
> +still use the existing point version scheme. So<c>1.119</c> becomes<c>1.120</c>, not
> +<c>1.12</c>.
> +</impo>
Hi Josh, I've got a few questions for this one. First of all, I believe
it should read "not <c>2</c>" instead of 1.12. Also, what's the reason
for metadoc.xml being special? I assume it's because you can't be sure
that none of our XSLT stuff breaks, which is a fair concern.
I'll try to walk through them to see if I see an obvious error, but it's
gonna take some time. If someone else likes XSLT, please step up and go
ahead with checking, I'm simply offering my services here because I've
done some XSLT stuff based on gorg for my pet project a few years ago,
and I have feeling that nobody else has ever touched XSLT since Xavier
disappeared.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
> +<impo>
> +The exception to this rule is<path>/doc/en/metadoc.xml</path>. Metadoc should
> +still use the existing point version scheme. So<c>1.119</c> becomes<c>1.120</c>, not
> +<c>1.12</c>.
> +</impo>
Hi Josh, I've got a few questions for this one. First of all, I believe
it should read "not <c>2</c>" instead of 1.12. Also, what's the reason
for metadoc.xml being special? I assume it's because you can't be sure
that none of our XSLT stuff breaks, which is a fair concern.
I'll try to walk through them to see if I see an obvious error, but it's
gonna take some time. If someone else likes XSLT, please step up and go
ahead with checking, I'm simply offering my services here because I've
done some XSLT stuff based on gorg for my pet project a few years ago,
and I have feeling that nobody else has ever touched XSLT since Xavier
disappeared.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth