Pardon me if you receive this message two times, I'm not sure it went to the
ml the first time:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:49:12PM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 14:08 -0300, Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
> > Good luck for the remaining proctors, they will need as they aparently
can't
> > even expect any support from council members.
>
> There's a *BIG* difference between support and blind support. Nobody
> ever promised the proctors blind support.
And the proctors never asked for blind support. If you didn´t like
something the proctors did, you should have contacted them first before
unauthorizing them in a public mailing list, asking why they did so. The
way you did it, it was like you wanted the proctors to fail.
As for the guidelines, as far as I remember you were invited to discuss
them with the proctors and in some point you chose to leave the process.
Pilla
ml the first time:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:49:12PM -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 14:08 -0300, Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
> > Good luck for the remaining proctors, they will need as they aparently
can't
> > even expect any support from council members.
>
> There's a *BIG* difference between support and blind support. Nobody
> ever promised the proctors blind support.
And the proctors never asked for blind support. If you didn´t like
something the proctors did, you should have contacted them first before
unauthorizing them in a public mailing list, asking why they did so. The
way you did it, it was like you wanted the proctors to fail.
As for the guidelines, as far as I remember you were invited to discuss
them with the proctors and in some point you chose to leave the process.
Pilla
Attached Files:
-
signature.asc (0.18 KB)