It looks like xemacs is currently in need of maintainers. The herd is
currently nonexistent and there is no one on the alias. There are a
number of bugs open about xemacs: http://tinyurl.com/makfd
I'm not sure how we currently handle such a situation, but I personally
think we should mask all of the packages if no maintainer can be found
to step up. So, is anyone willing to do so?
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
http://www.halcy0n.com
currently nonexistent and there is no one on the alias. There are a
number of bugs open about xemacs: http://tinyurl.com/makfd
I'm not sure how we currently handle such a situation, but I personally
think we should mask all of the packages if no maintainer can be found
to step up. So, is anyone willing to do so?
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
http://www.halcy0n.com