Mailing List Archive

administrivia...duplicate messages
SF is re-injecting articles into this list when
Cc'd on a posting.
administrivia...duplicate messages [ In reply to ]
>>>>> "Len" == Len Rose <len@netsys.com> writes:

Len> SF is re-injecting articles into this list when Cc'd on a
Len> posting.

Sue them: they can afford it now. Cite loss of list members,
goodwill, unfair monopolistic practices as cause. Hell, you may even
be able to get our friend the DMCA into the picture!

--
Raju Mathur raju@kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/
It is the mind that moves
Re: administrivia...duplicate messages [ In reply to ]
* Len Rose (len@netsys.com) [020801 12:36]:
>
> SF is re-injecting articles into this list when
> Cc'd on a posting.

Len,

Actually, if you cared to read the headers of the duplicate messages
you'd notice that they are being reinjects by some subscribers of the
list, not us.

--
Elias Levy
SecurityFocus
http://www.securityfocus.com/
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Re: administrivia...duplicate messages [ In reply to ]
Hi Elias, I did look at the headers, and they're showing SF mail servers.

Len

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:59:34PM -0600, aleph1@securityfocus.com wrote:
> * Len Rose (len@netsys.com) [020801 12:36]:
> >
> > SF is re-injecting articles into this list when
> > Cc'd on a posting.
>
> Len,
>
> Actually, if you cared to read the headers of the duplicate messages
> you'd notice that they are being reinjects by some subscribers of the
> list, not us.
>
> --
> Elias Levy
> SecurityFocus
> http://www.securityfocus.com/
> Si vis pacem, para bellum
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Full-Disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
Re: administrivia...duplicate messages [ In reply to ]
Do you two think you could take this crap off list(s)? The S/N ratio is
already bad enough..


On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Len Rose wrote:

> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:43:04 -0400
> From: Len Rose <len@netsys.com>
> Reply-To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] administrivia...duplicate messages
>
> Hi Elias, I did look at the headers, and they're showing SF mail servers.
>
> Len
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:59:34PM -0600, aleph1@securityfocus.com wrote:
> > * Len Rose (len@netsys.com) [020801 12:36]:
> > >
> > > SF is re-injecting articles into this list when
> > > Cc'd on a posting.
> >
> > Len,
> >
> > Actually, if you cared to read the headers of the duplicate messages
> > you'd notice that they are being reinjects by some subscribers of the
> > list, not us.
> >
> > --
> > Elias Levy
> > SecurityFocus
> > http://www.securityfocus.com/
> > Si vis pacem, para bellum
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Full-Disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> > http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Full-Disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
>

--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@mfn.org

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: administrivia...duplicate messages [ In reply to ]
If you think the S/N is bad here, your not reading BugTraq and VulnWatch.
There's more cross posting on the security lists now than alt.flame.

List Admins-
Please try to get to the bottom of these duplicate/cross posted messages
and feel free to post the discussion to the list.

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:23:11 -0500 (CDT)
Alif The Terrible <measl@mfn.org> wrote:

>
> Do you two think you could take this crap off list(s)? The S/N ratio is
> already bad enough..
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Len Rose wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:43:04 -0400
> > From: Len Rose <len@netsys.com>
> > Reply-To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> > To: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] administrivia...duplicate messages
> >
> > Hi Elias, I did look at the headers, and they're showing SF mail
> > servers.
> >
> > Len
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 12:59:34PM -0600, aleph1@securityfocus.com
> > wrote:
> > > * Len Rose (len@netsys.com) [020801 12:36]:
> > > >
> > > > SF is re-injecting articles into this list when
> > > > Cc'd on a posting.
> > >
> > > Len,
> > >
> > > Actually, if you cared to read the headers of the duplicate messages
> > > you'd notice that they are being reinjects by some subscribers of
> > > the list, not us.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Elias Levy
> > > SecurityFocus
> > > http://www.securityfocus.com/
> > > Si vis pacem, para bellum

--
BillT@Mahagonny.com - PGP KeyID#: 0xFB966670

"Crappy old OSes have value in the basically negative sense that
changing to new ones makes us wish we'd never been born."
-Neal Stephenson 1999