Mailing List Archive

[Bug 480] manualroute: please add "ignore" option for host_find_failed
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=480





------- Comment #1 from holmgren@lysator.liu.se 2007-03-07 13:08 -------
> Please add an "ignore" option for host_find_failed in manualroute, so taht
> route_data "foo.example:bar.example" can do the right thing (delivering to
> foo.example" even when bar.example does not exist.

What should be the outcome if all hosts turn out nonexistent? Decline, pass,
fail, freeze, or dependent on some other option?

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[Bug 480] manualroute: please add "ignore" option for host_find_failed [ In reply to ]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=480





------- Comment #2 from holmgren@lysator.liu.se 2007-03-07 13:29 -------
When I think about it, it should probably behave as if all hosts were in
ignore_target_hosts, i.e. decline.

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
Re: [Bug 480] manualroute: please add "ignore" option for host_find_failed [ In reply to ]
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, holmgren@lysator.liu.se wrote:

> What should be the outcome if all hosts turn out nonexistent? Decline, pass,
> fail, freeze, or dependent on some other option?

The same as if the host list was empty is my first thought.

--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book

--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[Bug 480] manualroute: please add "ignore" option for host_find_failed [ In reply to ]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=480





------- Comment #3 from ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk 2007-03-07 14:35 -------
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, holmgren@lysator.liu.se wrote:

> What should be the outcome if all hosts turn out nonexistent? Decline, pass,
> fail, freeze, or dependent on some other option?

The same as if the host list was empty is my first thought.

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
[Bug 480] manualroute: please add "ignore" option for host_find_failed [ In reply to ]
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=480


ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED




------- Comment #4 from ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk 2007-03-13 15:34 -------
I have committed a patch. The host_find_failed option in the manualroute router
can now be set to "ignore", to completely ignore a host whose IP address cannot
be found. If all hosts are ignored, the behaviour is controlled by the new
host_all_ignored option.

--
Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##