------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467
Summary: SPF checking doesn't fallback to HELO with null sender
Product: Exim
Version: 4.66
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: bug
Priority: medium
Component: Experimental
AssignedTo: ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk
ReportedBy: peter@bowyer.org
QAContact: exim-dev@exim.org
If called correctly, libspf2 provides transparent fallback to HELO checking
instead of MFROM checking in the case of a null sender. Due to the order in
which arguments are set up in the SPF_request_t structure in spf.c, this
behaviour is subverted. SPF tests with a null sender currently always return
status 'none'.
Related to #464
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=467
Summary: SPF checking doesn't fallback to HELO with null sender
Product: Exim
Version: 4.66
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: bug
Priority: medium
Component: Experimental
AssignedTo: ph10@hermes.cam.ac.uk
ReportedBy: peter@bowyer.org
QAContact: exim-dev@exim.org
If called correctly, libspf2 provides transparent fallback to HELO checking
instead of MFROM checking in the case of a null sender. Due to the order in
which arguments are set up in the SPF_request_t structure in spf.c, this
behaviour is subverted. SPF tests with a null sender currently always return
status 'none'.
Related to #464
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##