Hi,
it's a little unpleasant to bring this up again, but...
> + /* Generate mailbox headers. The $received_for variable is (up to at least
> + Exim 4.64) never set here, because it is only set when expanding the
> + contents of the Received: header line. However, the code below will use it
> + if it should become available in future. */
> +
> + temp_string = expand_string(
> + US"From ${if def:return_path{$return_path}{MAILER-DAEMON}} ${tod_bsdinbox}\n"
> + "${if def:sender_address{X-Envelope-From: <${sender_address}>\n}}"
> + "${if def:received_for{X-Envelope-To: <${received_for}>\n}}");
is there a good reason to use the not-working $received_for instead of
$recipients? The latter is always defined and contains _all_ recipients,
not only one.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
it's a little unpleasant to bring this up again, but...
> + /* Generate mailbox headers. The $received_for variable is (up to at least
> + Exim 4.64) never set here, because it is only set when expanding the
> + contents of the Received: header line. However, the code below will use it
> + if it should become available in future. */
> +
> + temp_string = expand_string(
> + US"From ${if def:return_path{$return_path}{MAILER-DAEMON}} ${tod_bsdinbox}\n"
> + "${if def:sender_address{X-Envelope-From: <${sender_address}>\n}}"
> + "${if def:received_for{X-Envelope-To: <${received_for}>\n}}");
is there a good reason to use the not-working $received_for instead of
$recipients? The latter is always defined and contains _all_ recipients,
not only one.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##