http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119
------- Additional Comments From holmgren@lysator.liu.se 2006-09-25 22:04 -------
This seems a bit inaccurate. In a *router*, if you remove a header field (or
rather mark it to be removed) you can still refer to the previous value,
whether you want it or not, and use it in the replacement. However, in a system
filter, you have to use an intermediate header field.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
------- Additional Comments From holmgren@lysator.liu.se 2006-09-25 22:04 -------
This seems a bit inaccurate. In a *router*, if you remove a header field (or
rather mark it to be removed) you can still refer to the previous value,
whether you want it or not, and use it in the replacement. However, in a system
filter, you have to use an intermediate header field.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##