On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:05 -0600, Travis Williams wrote:
> Is there a simple method to limit what the user sees on the web page
> with out me changing the code? Truthfully I really only want them to
> see their personal information (full name, email address, language,
> password) and nothing else.
>
>
>
> It would also be nice to be able to create a group and create an admin
> for that group that can only create/modify users with in that group,
> possibly even more granular control, where I can say if a person can
> add/remove collections, or if he can just add/remove users, or just
> change user passwords. I don't think this is in any way there today,
> but just thought I'd throw it out there as a suggestion.
I'd be very happy to see patches which provided more granular control in
this area.
Really, I'd be happy to see patches which fixed many of the deficiencies
in this part of the software... :-)
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64(272)DEBIAN
It is often easier to tame a wild idea than to breathe life into a
dull one. -- Alex Osborn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.davical.org/pipermail/davical-dev/attachments/20110128/e75b265c/attachment.pgp>
> Is there a simple method to limit what the user sees on the web page
> with out me changing the code? Truthfully I really only want them to
> see their personal information (full name, email address, language,
> password) and nothing else.
>
>
>
> It would also be nice to be able to create a group and create an admin
> for that group that can only create/modify users with in that group,
> possibly even more granular control, where I can say if a person can
> add/remove collections, or if he can just add/remove users, or just
> change user passwords. I don't think this is in any way there today,
> but just thought I'd throw it out there as a suggestion.
I'd be very happy to see patches which provided more granular control in
this area.
Really, I'd be happy to see patches which fixed many of the deficiencies
in this part of the software... :-)
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com +64(272)DEBIAN
It is often easier to tame a wild idea than to breathe life into a
dull one. -- Alex Osborn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.davical.org/pipermail/davical-dev/attachments/20110128/e75b265c/attachment.pgp>