Mailing List Archive: Modular QoS CLI vs CAR

inline

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou wrote:

> We are using CAR until now and we are thinking of moving to MQC (after a reccomendation
> from Vincent). We had already some tests with it and it seems to work fine.
>
> We are not interested (until now) about traffic class but only for traffic policy.
>
> In terms of performance and cpu usage which one is the best?

don't remember.

> In which one will CEF make a bigger difference?
>

both require CEF.

> Is this the right way to move on or should we stick to CAR?
>

you should move to MQC as all new QoS features will be built around the
MQC framework. e.g. there will be no new enhancements to CAR.

cheers
.siva

>
> --
> ***********************************
> Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
> Network Design & Operations Center
> FORTHnet S.A.
> <achatz@forthnet.gr>
> ***********************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>