Guy's,
I had a customer upgrade to a G2 processor and had similar symptoms.
We turned on following features on each physical port"
no ip route-cache cef
no ip route-cache
We also set the following command on the ethernet uplink:
ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
See if this helps
RR
On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:00 PM, cisco-bba-request@puck.nether.net wrote:
> Send cisco-bba mailing list submissions to
> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-bba-request@puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-bba-owner@puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-bba digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS (Ran
> Liebermann)
> 2. Re: Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS (Thomas Koeppe)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:27:10 +0300
> From: "Ran Liebermann" <ranmails@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS
> To: "Thomas Koeppe" <thomas_k_1@gmx.net>
> Cc: cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <8c19328e0709090927n55097d57v8c77c0496996e4c1@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> You have a lot of input errors on your Fa1/0.
>
> 8239 input errors, 8233 CRC
>
> I would try to sort that out first.
>
> --
> Ran.
>
>
> On 09/09/07, Thomas Koeppe <thomas_k_1@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're working on a test szenario to terminate a small number of PPPoE
>> users comming in through a l2tp tunnel. It seems that all works fine
>> (l2tp tunnel is comming up, authentication and accounting against
>> Freeradius server will work) except the low bandwidth throughput
>> problem.
>>
>> As LNS we run a Cisco 7206 nonVXR with NPE-200, 96 MB RAM and 1
>> FE-Interface. LAC is provided and maintained by our upstream telco. I
>> know they run a Cisco 7206 VXR with NPE-G1.
>>
>> During the test setup there was only one customer connected to the
>> lns.
>> (2 Mbit/s down, 192 kbit/s up) Throughput after terminating the
>> session
>> on the lns was ~ 180 kbit/s down and ~ 160 kbit/s up.
>>
>> Any ideas how to fix this? Does someone see things which I doesn't
>> see?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-bba/attachments/
> 20070909/828dab96/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:55:42 +0200
> From: Thomas Koeppe <thomas_k_1@gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS
> To: Ran Liebermann <ranmails@gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <46E4339E.7040502@gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>
> Unfortunately yes. Nothings happens, the same low throughput as it
> ever was.
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Ran Liebermann <ranmails@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The thrgouhputs are still low?
>>
>> --
>> Ran.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/09/07, Thomas Koeppe <thomas_k_1@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> Ran Liebermann <ranmails@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You have a lot of input errors on your Fa1/0.
>>>>
>>>> 8239 input errors, 8233 CRC
>>>>
>>>> I would try to sort that out first.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ran.
>>> Done. I've hardcoded the switch port to operate in 100M full
>>> duplex. Now
>>> the counter do not increase any longer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>
> End of cisco-bba Digest, Vol 51, Issue 4
> ****************************************
I had a customer upgrade to a G2 processor and had similar symptoms.
We turned on following features on each physical port"
no ip route-cache cef
no ip route-cache
We also set the following command on the ethernet uplink:
ip tcp adjust-mss 1300
See if this helps
RR
On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:00 PM, cisco-bba-request@puck.nether.net wrote:
> Send cisco-bba mailing list submissions to
> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-bba-request@puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-bba-owner@puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-bba digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS (Ran
> Liebermann)
> 2. Re: Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS (Thomas Koeppe)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:27:10 +0300
> From: "Ran Liebermann" <ranmails@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS
> To: "Thomas Koeppe" <thomas_k_1@gmx.net>
> Cc: cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <8c19328e0709090927n55097d57v8c77c0496996e4c1@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> You have a lot of input errors on your Fa1/0.
>
> 8239 input errors, 8233 CRC
>
> I would try to sort that out first.
>
> --
> Ran.
>
>
> On 09/09/07, Thomas Koeppe <thomas_k_1@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're working on a test szenario to terminate a small number of PPPoE
>> users comming in through a l2tp tunnel. It seems that all works fine
>> (l2tp tunnel is comming up, authentication and accounting against
>> Freeradius server will work) except the low bandwidth throughput
>> problem.
>>
>> As LNS we run a Cisco 7206 nonVXR with NPE-200, 96 MB RAM and 1
>> FE-Interface. LAC is provided and maintained by our upstream telco. I
>> know they run a Cisco 7206 VXR with NPE-G1.
>>
>> During the test setup there was only one customer connected to the
>> lns.
>> (2 Mbit/s down, 192 kbit/s up) Throughput after terminating the
>> session
>> on the lns was ~ 180 kbit/s down and ~ 160 kbit/s up.
>>
>> Any ideas how to fix this? Does someone see things which I doesn't
>> see?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-bba/attachments/
> 20070909/828dab96/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:55:42 +0200
> From: Thomas Koeppe <thomas_k_1@gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] Low bandwidth throuput on 7206 acting as LNS
> To: Ran Liebermann <ranmails@gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <46E4339E.7040502@gmx.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
>
> Unfortunately yes. Nothings happens, the same low throughput as it
> ever was.
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Ran Liebermann <ranmails@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The thrgouhputs are still low?
>>
>> --
>> Ran.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/09/07, Thomas Koeppe <thomas_k_1@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> Ran Liebermann <ranmails@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> You have a lot of input errors on your Fa1/0.
>>>>
>>>> 8239 input errors, 8233 CRC
>>>>
>>>> I would try to sort that out first.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ran.
>>> Done. I've hardcoded the switch port to operate in 100M full
>>> duplex. Now
>>> the counter do not increase any longer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>
> End of cisco-bba Digest, Vol 51, Issue 4
> ****************************************