I've been looking to deploy per-session based QoS policies to a number
of various PPPoE users using different transport mediums to connect to
our network. Some come in via VLAN tagged traffic, others come in via
Fast/Gig-E (untagged) and others come in via ATM PVCs (both aggregated
and non-aggregated).
Looking at some of the Cisco "per-session qos" docs, everything relates
to VC's, and not really to "PPPoX" sessions in general. Reading deeper
says that the AVPair attributes and policy-maps work at the VC level...
is there any way to get LLQ & CBWFQ to work at the actual PPPoE session
level? Since we get a lot of pre-aggregated layer2 users handed to us
on Gig-E, it's impossible for our routers to tell exactly how much
bandwidth the user really has. I was hoping that we could do something
via RADIUS and AVPairs to setup some QoS parameters to do some bandwidth
reservation and/or priority queuing on the user/virtual-access level...
possible?
More importantly, I was referring to the following AVPairs:
sub-qos-policy-in/out
Suggestions?
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com)
PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720 292A 8580 500E 66F9 0BFC
Programming is an art form that fights back.
_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
of various PPPoE users using different transport mediums to connect to
our network. Some come in via VLAN tagged traffic, others come in via
Fast/Gig-E (untagged) and others come in via ATM PVCs (both aggregated
and non-aggregated).
Looking at some of the Cisco "per-session qos" docs, everything relates
to VC's, and not really to "PPPoX" sessions in general. Reading deeper
says that the AVPair attributes and policy-maps work at the VC level...
is there any way to get LLQ & CBWFQ to work at the actual PPPoE session
level? Since we get a lot of pre-aggregated layer2 users handed to us
on Gig-E, it's impossible for our routers to tell exactly how much
bandwidth the user really has. I was hoping that we could do something
via RADIUS and AVPairs to setup some QoS parameters to do some bandwidth
reservation and/or priority queuing on the user/virtual-access level...
possible?
More importantly, I was referring to the following AVPairs:
sub-qos-policy-in/out
Suggestions?
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
rblayzor\@(inoc.net|gmail.com)
PGP: 0x66F90BFC @ http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 6296 F715 038B 44C1 2720 292A 8580 500E 66F9 0BFC
Programming is an art form that fights back.
_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba