thanks,
sorry I am still asking but I am afraid I was not precise enough.
The right solution is !very! important for me
because I am refactoring/optimizing the core tex layer of my working
TeX driven bricolage instance and I would't
like to get optimized="not working" one. [ I probably will, anyway;)]
Here is the screenshot of a typical story preview screen my bric
produces (5 min example with "random" colors)
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/delta/tex-bric-example.png and the corresponding bulkedit story screen
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/delta/tex-bric-example1-bulkedit.png You can compare the bric result with an example from mathworld
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EulerFormula.html I think bricolage can do math better!
Back to the problem.
I' d like my /autohandler look something like that
<%init>
.....
</%init>
% $burner->chain_next
<%cleanup>
#1.
my $output= get output buffer # (ie complete Html of the processed
page in the form it will be written to disk)
# $output=$m->{'request_buffer'} works in my tests
#2.
TeX::do_some_magic($output); # heavy job with tex in background
#3. now I'am ready to filter output
my $new_output=TeX::do_some_substitutions($output); #
$m->clear_buffer;
$m->print($new_output);
</%cleanup>
Using <%filter> to make substitutions does't seem (to me) to be the
right solution
because I had no chance to TeX::do_some_magic() before.
thanks in advance
-Krzysztof
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:50 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Krzysztof Rudnik wrote:
>
>> To be more precise I want to modify page content after it's been
>> completed and before it is written to a file
>>
>> my substitution is going to do very hard job
>>
>> <%filter>
>> s/foo(.*?)bar/modify($1,$args)/ge;
>> </%filter>
>>
>> where modifiy() is a subroutine defined somewhere and it uses some
>> external modules
>> Do you think that using filters is the right way to go?
>
> Yes. Use one one in your root-level category template (/autohandler).
>
> Best,
>
> David
>