Mailing List Archive: Re: [8495] publish

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.

Mar 12, 2009, 10:01 AM

Post #1 of 5 (3139 views)

On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:20 AM, slanning@bricolage.cc wrote:

> + # xxx: here I just declare that if we're updating
> + # then it's already been published before;
> + # I don't know how else to do it with our crappy soap interface
> + my $publish_crap = $operation eq 'create'
> + ? ' <publish_status>0</publish_status>'
> + : <<EOPC;

Between your “craps” and my “fucks,” people are going to start getting
ideas about the quality of our code. ;-P

David

RE: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [ In reply to ]

D-Beaudet at NGA

Mar 12, 2009, 12:36 PM

Post #2 of 5 (3009 views)

Permalink

Not exactly descriptive variable names...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:david@kineticode.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:01 PM
> To: devel@lists.bricolage.cc
> Subject: Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:20 AM, slanning@bricolage.cc wrote:
>
> > + # xxx: here I just declare that if we're updating
> > + # then it's already been published before;
> > + # I don't know how else to do it with our crappy soap interface
> > + my $publish_crap = $operation eq 'create'
> > + ? ' <publish_status>0</publish_status>'
> > + : <<EOPC;
>
> Between your "craps" and my "fucks," people are going to start getting
> ideas about the quality of our code. ;-P
>
> David

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [ In reply to ]

david at kineticode

Mar 12, 2009, 1:58 PM

Post #3 of 5 (2995 views)

Permalink

On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Beaudet, David wrote:

> Not exactly descriptive variable names...

% ack 'my \$ass\b' lib
lib/Bric/Biz/Workflow/Parts/Desk.pm

:-P

D

RE: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [ In reply to ]

lannings at who

Mar 13, 2009, 1:24 AM

Post #4 of 5 (2983 views)

Permalink

It's related to publish elements, and it's crap.
Suggest a better name.

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Beaudet, David wrote:
> Not exactly descriptive variable names...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:david@kineticode.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:01 PM
>> To: devel@lists.bricolage.cc
>> Subject: Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:20 AM, slanning@bricolage.cc wrote:
>>
>>> + # xxx: here I just declare that if we're updating
>>> + # then it's already been published before;
>>> + # I don't know how else to do it with our crappy soap interface
>>> + my $publish_crap = $operation eq 'create'
>>> + ? ' <publish_status>0</publish_status>'
>>> + : <<EOPC;
>>
>> Between your "craps" and my "fucks," people are going to start getting
>> ideas about the quality of our code. ;-P
>>
>> David

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [ In reply to ]

david at kineticode

Mar 13, 2009, 9:34 AM

Post #5 of 5 (2993 views)

Permalink

On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:24 AM, Scott Lanning wrote:

> It's related to publish elements, and it's crap.
> Suggest a better name.

Crap is perfect. I was amused.

D