Theo Schlossnagle wrote:
> Distributed locking with Spread is quite easy if you have already
> exerted the effort to handle remedial content replication with AGREED
> messages. However, if a machine dies or gets "stuck" (app crashes,
> etc.) you need to be careful to drop or time out the lock, respectively.
Splash! does distributed locking...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
> Distributed locking with Spread is quite easy if you have already
> exerted the effort to handle remedial content replication with AGREED
> messages. However, if a machine dies or gets "stuck" (app crashes,
> etc.) you need to be careful to drop or time out the lock, respectively.
Splash! does distributed locking...
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff