--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am trying to setup something that sounds straightforward to me. I have a=
server-farm with
webservers running httpd_doc on port 80 and httpd_perl on port 8080. Right =
now the doc server proxies
some requests to localhost:8080. I want to use backhand for this instead. =
So I installed it and configured it
on both servers, running on different ports. But somehow they seem to thin=
k they are the same server.
On looking on the backhand-status page, reloading it will always show one m=
achine, sometime the one on port 80,=20
sometimes the one on port 8080. Is it possible that backhand uses IP only =
to differentiate the servers, not the
combination IP+Port ???
I am confused here, everything seems to work fine, except that particular t=
hing...
Also, I read some information on the mailing-list archives on how to replac=
e mod_proxy by mod_backhand for a setup like=20
mine, finding references to BackhandSelfRedirect, but I am absolutely not s=
ure. How can I make my document server backhand
all *.pl requests to a backhand group of perl_servers ???
Thanks for any information
--=20
+-----------------------------------------------+
| Philippe M. Chiasson <gozer@hbesoftware.com> |
| SmartWorker http://www.smartworker.org |
| IM : gozerhbe ICQ : gozer/18279998 |
+-----------------------------------------------+
Unix has a dang lot of computer science mixed in with the
crap.=20
-- Larry Wall
perl -e '$$=3D\${gozer};{$_=3Dunpack(P26,pack(L,$$));/^Just Another Perl Ha=
cker!\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5/0XK3t2EuUQ3bNwRAox0AKDqQLSx76dTJj2JOl172d0ImSHdJQCeJdd6
bvh+Sw2TuJpUJVhRkkXt/IQ=
=Vwgu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am trying to setup something that sounds straightforward to me. I have a=
server-farm with
webservers running httpd_doc on port 80 and httpd_perl on port 8080. Right =
now the doc server proxies
some requests to localhost:8080. I want to use backhand for this instead. =
So I installed it and configured it
on both servers, running on different ports. But somehow they seem to thin=
k they are the same server.
On looking on the backhand-status page, reloading it will always show one m=
achine, sometime the one on port 80,=20
sometimes the one on port 8080. Is it possible that backhand uses IP only =
to differentiate the servers, not the
combination IP+Port ???
I am confused here, everything seems to work fine, except that particular t=
hing...
Also, I read some information on the mailing-list archives on how to replac=
e mod_proxy by mod_backhand for a setup like=20
mine, finding references to BackhandSelfRedirect, but I am absolutely not s=
ure. How can I make my document server backhand
all *.pl requests to a backhand group of perl_servers ???
Thanks for any information
--=20
+-----------------------------------------------+
| Philippe M. Chiasson <gozer@hbesoftware.com> |
| SmartWorker http://www.smartworker.org |
| IM : gozerhbe ICQ : gozer/18279998 |
+-----------------------------------------------+
Unix has a dang lot of computer science mixed in with the
crap.=20
-- Larry Wall
perl -e '$$=3D\${gozer};{$_=3Dunpack(P26,pack(L,$$));/^Just Another Perl Ha=
cker!\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE5/0XK3t2EuUQ3bNwRAox0AKDqQLSx76dTJj2JOl172d0ImSHdJQCeJdd6
bvh+Sw2TuJpUJVhRkkXt/IQ=
=Vwgu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--