Mailing List Archive

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:51:44PM -0700, Mark A. Garcia wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> Has anyone gotten apache 1.3.26 w/mod_backhand to run successfully in a
> freebsd jail?
>
> Is it even possible to run this in a jail w/ mod_backhand?
>
> I'm running into a problem where apache is doing a call to shmget. Of
> course the jailed environment blocks these calls.

And setting sysctl for freebsd of jail.sysvipc_allowed to 1 is not an
option ;-)

>
> Cheers,
> -.mag
>
> _______________________________________________
> backhand-users mailing list
> backhand-users@lists.backhand.org
> http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/backhand-users

Mark A. Garcia wrote:

>On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 05:51:44PM -0700, Mark A. Garcia wrote:
>
>
>>Greetings All,
>>
>>Has anyone gotten apache 1.3.26 w/mod_backhand to run successfully in a
>>freebsd jail?
>>
>>Is it even possible to run this in a jail w/ mod_backhand?
>>
>>I'm running into a problem where apache is doing a call to shmget. Of
>>course the jailed environment blocks these calls.
>>
>>
>
>And setting sysctl for freebsd of jail.sysvipc_allowed to 1 is not an
>option ;-)
>
>
I doubt it will work in a jail then. Apache uses shm and so does
mod_backhand. Additionally, mod_backhand extensively uses file
descriptor passing of open unix domain sockets (which is a sys V IPC
thing, I think)

--
Theo Schlossnagle
Principal Consultant
OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- http://www.omniti.com/
Phone: +1 301 776 6376 Fax: +1 410 880 4879
1024D/82844984/95FD 30F1 489E 4613 F22E 491A 7E88 364C 8284 4984
2047R/33131B65/71 F7 95 64 49 76 5D BA 3D 90 B9 9F BE 27 24 E7