Mailing List Archive

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:41:19PM -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote:
> Is ATRPMS (or its upstream provider) down? I can't connect to any
> atrpms.netsites (dl, www, list).

It crashed due to too high memory consumption, which in turn happened
due to too many httpd downloaders. Which probably was only a few real
persons with download accelerators :(
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060505/65fd7ba9/attachment.bin

On 5/4/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:41:19PM -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote:
> > Is ATRPMS (or its upstream provider) down? I can't connect to any
> > atrpms.netsites (dl, www, list).
>
> It crashed due to too high memory consumption, which in turn happened
> due to too many httpd downloaders. Which probably was only a few real
> persons with download accelerators :(

Have you lowered the number of concurrent connections allowed by
Apache? Have you thought about putting squid in front of apache as a
reverse proxy? Squid works much better at handling high numbers of
concurrent connections than Apache does as it doesn't require a
dedicated thread or process for each connection.

-Dave

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 05:48:14PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> On 5/4/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:41:19PM -0700, Fedor Pikus wrote:
> > > Is ATRPMS (or its upstream provider) down? I can't connect to any
> > > atrpms.netsites (dl, www, list).
> >
> > It crashed due to too high memory consumption, which in turn happened
> > due to too many httpd downloaders. Which probably was only a few real
> > persons with download accelerators :(
>
> Have you lowered the number of concurrent connections allowed by
> Apache? Have you thought about putting squid in front of apache as a
> reverse proxy? Squid works much better at handling high numbers of
> concurrent connections than Apache does as it doesn't require a
> dedicated thread or process for each connection.

Hm, that's an idea. squid might also handle the byte range
"accelerator" accesses, e.g. it may translate them to one fetch and
then deliver in pieces ... (?)
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060506/e47d3b3d/attachment.bin

On 5/6/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > Have you lowered the number of concurrent connections allowed by
> > Apache? Have you thought about putting squid in front of apache as a
> > reverse proxy? Squid works much better at handling high numbers of
> > concurrent connections than Apache does as it doesn't require a
> > dedicated thread or process for each connection.
>
> Hm, that's an idea. squid might also handle the byte range
> "accelerator" accesses, e.g. it may translate them to one fetch and
> then deliver in pieces ... (?)

I'm not sure how squid will handle that case, but regardless it should
really improve performance of your server. Takes some
reading/configuring to get it working, you'll probably want to get
squid running on a different port at first before making it the
primary on port 80.

-Dave

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:42:59AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> On 5/6/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > > Have you lowered the number of concurrent connections allowed by
> > > Apache? Have you thought about putting squid in front of apache as a
> > > reverse proxy? Squid works much better at handling high numbers of
> > > concurrent connections than Apache does as it doesn't require a
> > > dedicated thread or process for each connection.
> >
> > Hm, that's an idea. squid might also handle the byte range
> > "accelerator" accesses, e.g. it may translate them to one fetch and
> > then deliver in pieces ... (?)
>
> I'm not sure how squid will handle that case, but regardless it should
> really improve performance of your server. Takes some
> reading/configuring to get it working, you'll probably want to get
> squid running on a different port at first before making it the
> primary on port 80.

Yes, I will be experimenting first. I had squid running in transparent
proxy mode before, the only thing I'm a bit worried are files going
through two processes, e.g. eating twice as much memory.

BTW I found tha yum is supposed to only open up one connection. Maybe
some users have keepalive=0 in their yum.conf.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060507/a8c7bcb6/attachment.bin

On 5/7/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> Yes, I will be experimenting first. I had squid running in transparent
> proxy mode before, the only thing I'm a bit worried are files going
> through two processes, e.g. eating twice as much memory.

Memory use will be much lower. Squid will transfer the file from
Apache very quickly since it's on the same machine/network, so it's
use of Apache processes will be very limited.

So for a light load your machine will use more memory as squid will
also be running, but for heavy loads memory utilization will be much
lower as you shouldn't see lots of concurrent Apache connections,
especially if you give squid some cache space.

Other alternatives would be to look at thttpd or lighttpd which scale
much better than Apache.

-Dave

On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 12:31:16PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
> On 5/7/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > Yes, I will be experimenting first. I had squid running in transparent
> > proxy mode before, the only thing I'm a bit worried are files going
> > through two processes, e.g. eating twice as much memory.
>
> Memory use will be much lower. Squid will transfer the file from
> Apache very quickly since it's on the same machine/network, so it's
> use of Apache processes will be very limited.
>
> So for a light load your machine will use more memory as squid will
> also be running, but for heavy loads memory utilization will be much
> lower as you shouldn't see lots of concurrent Apache connections,
> especially if you give squid some cache space.
>
> Other alternatives would be to look at thttpd or lighttpd which scale
> much better than Apache.

I think I'd like to try http & squid first. But maybe the KeepAlive
settings will already help. At least legit downloads will now be
really able to reuse the same connection.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060508/9caa9641/attachment.bin

Hi George,

> I've been unable to get into Axel's site for the past 2 days. Is
> anyone else having this trouble?

I go to http://atrpms.net and it times out.

Regards,

Michael.

> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
------- End of Original Message -------


_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On 10/6/07, Michael Mansour <mic@npgx.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi George,
>
> > I've been unable to get into Axel's site for the past 2 days. Is
> > anyone else having this trouble?
>
> I go to http://atrpms.net and it times out.



The site is down, but I am being able to use this mirror (change for your
architecture):

http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/fc6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/


--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ

On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 11:09 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
> On 10/6/07, Michael Mansour <mic@npgx.com.au> wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> > I've been unable to get into Axel's site for the past 2
> days. Is
> > anyone else having this trouble?
>
> I go to http://atrpms.net and it times out.
>
>
> The site is down, but I am being able to use this mirror (change for
> your architecture):
>
> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/fc6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/

i switched smart to look here. i think there's something very wrong
just now. when i have smart update i see a TON of fc6 packages
replacing f7 packages. this seems very wrong!

e.g.:

ffmpeg, imlib2, libavcodec51, libavutil49, libdvdread, etc...

john

>
--
cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.


_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On 10/6/07, john bray <john@johnbray.name> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 11:09 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/6/07, Michael Mansour <mic@npgx.com.au> wrote:
> > Hi George,
> >
> > > I've been unable to get into Axel's site for the past 2
> > days. Is
> > > anyone else having this trouble?
> >
> > I go to http://atrpms.net and it times out.
> >
> >
> > The site is down, but I am being able to use this mirror (change for
> > your architecture):
> >
> >
> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/fc6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/
>
> i switched smart to look here. i think there's something very wrong
> just now. when i have smart update i see a TON of fc6 packages
> replacing f7 packages. this seems very wrong!




The link I pointed out is for FC6 x86_64 (fc6-x86_64), which is what I have
on the computer
I am using right now.

This is for F7 i386.

http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/f7-i386/atrpms/stable/

Maybe replacing f7-i386 for $releasever-$basearch will work for everybody.

http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable/

You can look for other mirrors out there. Just remember to check the release
and the architecture.

Try the URL in your browser first to see if you are going to the right place
before putting it in yum or smart.

--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ

On 10/6/07, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/6/07, john bray <john@johnbray.name> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 11:09 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/6/07, Michael Mansour <mic@npgx.com.au> wrote:
> > > Hi George,
> > >
> > > > I've been unable to get into Axel's site for the past 2
> > > days. Is
> > > > anyone else having this trouble?
> > >
> > > I go to http://atrpms.net and it times out.
> > >
> > >
> > > The site is down, but I am being able to use this mirror (change for
> > > your architecture):
> > >
> > > http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/fc6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/
> >
> >
> > i switched smart to look here. i think there's something very wrong
> > just now. when i have smart update i see a TON of fc6 packages
> > replacing f7 packages. this seems very wrong!
>
>
>
>
> The link I pointed out is for FC6 x86_64 (fc6-x86_64), which is what I
> have on the computer
> I am using right now.
>
> This is for F7 i386.
>
>
> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/f7-i386/atrpms/stable/
>
> Maybe replacing f7-i386 for $releasever-$basearch will work for everybody.
>
>
> http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/Mirrors/atrpms/dl.atrpms.net/$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable/
>
> You can look for other mirrors out there. Just remember to check the
> release and the architecture.
>
> Try the URL in your browser first to see if you are going to the right
> place before putting it in yum or smart.
>
> --
> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
> LCG - UFRJ
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users


Does anyone know where i can get a mirror of the signing key?

Thanks,
Mitchell

> Does anyone know where i can get a mirror of the signing key?
>
> Thanks,
> Mitch
>



Do you mean atrpms signing key? It is in atrpms-70-1.noarch.rpm


[cascavel:/etc/smart/channels] listrpm atrpms-70-1
/etc/profile.d/atrpms.csh
/etc/profile.d/atrpms.sh
/usr/share/atrpms
/usr/share/atrpms/BETA-GPG-KEY.rawhide
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.atrpms <----------------------------
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.biorpms
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.ccrma
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.freshrpms
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.newrpms
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.redhat
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-GPG-KEY.redhat-fedora
/usr/share/atrpms/RPM-PGP-KEY.redhat
/usr/share/atrpms/addcustomkmdl


--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ

John Welch wrote:
> Anyone else having problems accessing ATrpms? Both the web-site and
> updates from the site (I'm using yum / PackageKit) appear to be down.
> Normally I would probably just silently wait out an outage, but I'm
> stuck in the middle of a F10 --> F11 PreUpgrade process on one of my
> systems.
>
> Thanks,
>
>

Smart hasn't been able to contact
http://dl.atrpms.net/f10-x86_64/atrpms/stable (or testing)
for at least a couple of days. Could you use a mirror?

John P





_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM, John Pilkington<J.Pilk@tesco.net> wrote:
> John Welch wrote:
>> Anyone else having problems accessing ATrpms?  Both the web-site and
>> updates from the site (I'm using yum / PackageKit) appear to be down.
>> Normally I would probably just silently wait out an outage, but I'm
>> stuck in the middle of a F10 --> F11 PreUpgrade process on one of my
>> systems.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>
> Smart hasn't been able to contact
> http://dl.atrpms.net/f10-x86_64/atrpms/stable (or testing)
> for at least a couple of days.  Could you use a mirror?
>
> John P
>

Thanks for confirming that it is down, and thanks for the mirror idea.
I think PreUpgrade uses the yum configuration, which for ATrpms is
not setup for a mirror list. I guess I could manually override the
configuration. There have been a lot of updates for F11 over the past
few days, so hopefully it will play nice.

John W.

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Hi,

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 07:04:37PM -0400, John Welch wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM, John Pilkington<J.Pilk@tesco.net> wrote:
> > John Welch wrote:
> >> Anyone else having problems accessing ATrpms?  Both the web-site and
> >> updates from the site (I'm using yum / PackageKit) appear to be down.
> >> Normally I would probably just silently wait out an outage, but I'm
> >> stuck in the middle of a F10 --> F11 PreUpgrade process on one of my
> >> systems.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Smart hasn't been able to contact
> > http://dl.atrpms.net/f10-x86_64/atrpms/stable (or testing)
> > for at least a couple of days.  Could you use a mirror?
> >
> > John P
> >
>
> Thanks for confirming that it is down, and thanks for the mirror idea.
> I think PreUpgrade uses the yum configuration, which for ATrpms is
> not setup for a mirror list. I guess I could manually override the
> configuration. There have been a lot of updates for F11 over the past
> few days, so hopefully it will play nice.

If it were down, these mails would have never reached anyone. :)

There is no sign of any issue on ATrpms' site, but I know there were
reports of some bad routing between some of the larger networks. If
you find any issues again try a traceroute and send the results to the
list. Ideally you could also send a working traceroute to compare.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Axel Thimm<Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 07:04:37PM -0400, John Welch wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:27 PM, John Pilkington<J.Pilk@tesco.net> wrote:
>> > John Welch wrote:
>> >> Anyone else having problems accessing ATrpms?  Both the web-site and
>> >> updates from the site (I'm using yum / PackageKit) appear to be down.
>> >> Normally I would probably just silently wait out an outage, but I'm
>> >> stuck in the middle of a F10 --> F11 PreUpgrade process on one of my
>> >> systems.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Smart hasn't been able to contact
>> > http://dl.atrpms.net/f10-x86_64/atrpms/stable (or testing)
>> > for at least a couple of days.  Could you use a mirror?
>> >
>> > John P
>> >
>>
>> Thanks for confirming that it is down, and thanks for the mirror idea.
>>  I think PreUpgrade uses the yum configuration, which for ATrpms is
>> not setup for a mirror list.  I guess I could manually override the
>> configuration.  There have been a lot of updates for F11 over the past
>> few days, so hopefully it will play nice.
>
> If it were down, these mails would have never reached anyone. :)
>
> There is no sign of any issue on ATrpms' site, but I know there were
> reports of some bad routing between some of the larger networks. If
> you find any issues again try a traceroute and send the results to the
> list. Ideally you could also send a working traceroute to compare.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
Thanks Axel. It seems OK now. If I run into further issues I'll get
the traceroute info.

John

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On 06/01/2010 15:18, sdkovacs wrote:
> Axel,
>
> Just as an FYI, atrpms.net and dl.atrpms.net seem to be down since at
> least last night.
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>
Was down for me too about 10 minutes ago, tried again just now and all
seems good

Dunc

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Firefox showed the mythtv 224 spin for el5 two days ago, but smart
didn't pick it up, preferring the mirrorservice.uk site that still
doesn't have it. After deleting the mirror from smart's list the
upgrade went ahead without a problem.

John P

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On 12/12/2011 4:08 PM, David Liana wrote:
> Can't seem to connect...
>

No, I can get to the direct download address just fine:

http://dl.atrpms.net/

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Kirk Bocek <t004@kbocek.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/12/2011 4:08 PM, David Liana wrote:
>
>> Can't seem to connect...
>>
>>
> No, I can get to the direct download address just fine:
>
> http://dl.atrpms.net/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/**mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users<http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users>


I can connect via web browser, but I get this error:
http://dl.atrpms.net/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
14] PYCURL ERROR 7 - "couldn't connect to host"
Trying other mirror.
Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository:
atrpms. Please verify its path and try again

On 23 Jun 2015 12:48 pm, "Phill Edwards" <philledwards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23 Jun 2015 8:04 am, "Stephen Collier" <judithc@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Is atrpms down?
>
> There's a post recently (last 2-3 days perhaps on mythtv users list)
saying it's retired but someone is creating new packages for Fedora.

Yes, just checked - search Gossamer Threads mythtv users scrpms

On 23/06/2015 04:23, Phill Edwards wrote:
>
>
> On 23 Jun 2015 12:48 pm, "Phill Edwards" <philledwards@gmail.com
> <mailto:philledwards@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23 Jun 2015 8:04 am, "Stephen Collier" <judithc@bigpond.net.au
> <mailto:judithc@bigpond.net.au>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is atrpms down?
> >
> > There's a post recently (last 2-3 days perhaps on mythtv users list)
> saying it's retired but someone is creating new packages for Fedora.
>
> Yes, just checked - search Gossamer Threads mythtv users scrpms
>
>
haha, you mean the post by Stephen? As in the Stephen you just replied to

On 6/23/2015 1:01 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:

On 23/06/2015 04:23, Phill Edwards wrote:

On 23 Jun 2015 12:48 pm, "Phill Edwards" <philledwards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 23 Jun 2015 8:04 am, "Stephen Collier" <judithc@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Is atrpms down?
>
> There's a post recently (last 2-3 days perhaps on mythtv users list) saying it's retired but someone is creating new packages for Fedora.

Yes, just checked - search Gossamer Threads mythtv users scrpms

haha, you mean the post by Stephen? As in the Stephen you just replied to

I just did a scan of SCRpms which included a --enablerepo=atrpms. No errors so I assume it is up. Maybe this was a blip.