Mailing List Archive

Re: dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386.rpm
Thanks for reporting, RHEL4 doesn't like the --uid option, but -u does
the same.

The upcoming update to 2.2.2 has this fixed. Please give it a try
later today or tomorrow.

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 05:34:56PM +0300, Jacques Goldberg wrote:
> <html style="direction: ltr;">
> <head>
>
> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
> <style type="text/css">body p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; } </style>
> </head>
> <body style="direction: ltr;"
> bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="latin-charset" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
> text="#000000">
> Dear Sir,<br>
> <br>
> There is a tiny bug in dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386.rpm and earlier
> which looks pretty much to be just a typo :<br>
> <br>
> [root@phep2 config]# rpm -Uvh dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386.rpm <br>
> warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature<br>
> warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature<br>
> warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature<br>
> Preparing...&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
> ########################################### [100%]<br>
> useradd: invalid option -- -<br>
> usage: useradd&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-u uid [-o]] [-g group] [-G group,...] <br>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-d home] [-s shell] [-c comment] [-m [-k template]]<br>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-f inactive] [-e expire ] [-p passwd] [-M] [-n] [-r] [-l]
> name<br>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; useradd&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -D [-g group] [-b base] [-s shell]<br>
> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [-f inactive] [-e expire ]<br>
> error: %pre(dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4.i386) scriptlet failed, exit
> status 1<br>
> error:&nbsp;&nbsp; install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping
> dovecot-2.2.1-4_135.el4<br>
> <br>
> Could you please either fix it or instruct me how to?<br>
> In the latter case can it be done and how by extracting the file to
> be corrected rom the binary rpm or should I use the src a nd
> recompile?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks<br>
> Jacques<br>
> <br>
> </body>
> </html>
>

--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users