Mailing List Archive

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.fc17.src.rpm


On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:20 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.ucina@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Paulo,
>
> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
> features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a src rpm
> when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>



--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ

On 04/05/13 17:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
> features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a src
> rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
Hello ,

I have downloaded the src rpm and have tried compiling . There is a
compilation issue :

+ mv
/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control
/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control-319.17
mv: cannot stat
`/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control':
No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.FWJrY3 (%install)


RPM build errors:
InstallSourcePackage at: psm.c:244: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature,
key ID 5549a96e: NOKEY
user roma does not exist - using root
group roma does not exist - using root
user roma does not exist - using root
group roma does not exist - using root
user roma does not exist - using root
group roma does not exist - using root
Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.FWJrY3 (%install)

Best Regards
Milorad

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous
versions
(the files were originally un-versioned).

Maybe nvidia fixed this issue and the renaming is no longer necessary.
Try commenting these two lines and see what happens...




On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.ucina@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04/05/13 17:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
>
>> Hello Paulo,
>>
>> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
>> features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a src rpm
>> when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Milorad
>>
> Hello ,
>
> I have downloaded the src rpm and have tried compiling . There is a
> compilation issue :
>
> + mv /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-**graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.**
> x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-**proxy-control /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-*
> *graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.**x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-**
> proxy-control-319.17
> mv: cannot stat `/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/**nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-**
> 155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-**cuda-proxy-control': No such file or
> directory
> error: Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.**FWJrY3 (%install)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> InstallSourcePackage at: psm.c:244: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key
> ID 5549a96e: NOKEY
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.**FWJrY3 (%install)
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>



--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ

On 06/05/13 23:20, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous
> versions
> (the files were originally un-versioned).
>
> Maybe nvidia fixed this issue and the renaming is no longer necessary.
> Try commenting these two lines and see what happens...
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.ucina@gmail.com
> <mailto:mo.ucina@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 04/05/13 17:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
>
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have
> some new features , would like to try it out . Can you please
> package up a src rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>
> Hello ,
>
> I have downloaded the src rpm and have tried compiling . There is
> a compilation issue :
>
> + mv
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control-319.17
> mv: cannot stat
> `/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control':
> No such file or directory
> error: Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.FWJrY3 (%install)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> InstallSourcePackage at: psm.c:244: Header V4 DSA/SHA1
> Signature, key ID 5549a96e: NOKEY
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.FWJrY3 (%install)
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
> DCC - UFRJ
Hello Paulo,

Thanks for that . I have commented the lines in the Spec file as per :

rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-installer
rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-uninstall
mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-settings
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-settings-%{version}
mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-xconfig
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-xconfig-%{version}
mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-bug-report.sh
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-bug-report-%{version}.sh
mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-smi
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-smi-%{version}
mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-debugdump
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-debugdump-%{version}
#mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control-%{version}
#mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server
%{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server-%{version}


That worked , and the compilation process continued , until we hit this :


Processing files: nvidia-graphics319.17-devel-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libOpenCL.so.1()(64bit)
libcuda.so.1()(64bit) libnvcuvid.so.1()(64bit)
libnvidia-cfg.so.1()(64bit) libnvidia-encode.so.1()(64bit)
libnvidia-ml.so.1()(64bit) libvdpau.so.1()(64bit)
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
/usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced


RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
/usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced


Best Regards

Milorad

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

This is easy. There are three new files
not listed in the package yet.

I will try to fix the spec ...


On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.ucina@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 06/05/13 23:20, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>> This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with previous
>> versions
>> (the files were originally un-versioned).
>>
>> Maybe nvidia fixed this issue and the renaming is no longer necessary.
>> Try commenting these two lines and see what happens...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.ucina@gmail.com <mailto:
>> mo.ucina@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/05/13 17:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
>>
>> Hello Paulo,
>>
>> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have
>> some new features , would like to try it out . Can you please
>> package up a src rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Milorad
>>
>> Hello ,
>>
>> I have downloaded the src rpm and have tried compiling . There is
>> a compilation issue :
>>
>> + mv
>> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-**graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.**
>> x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-**proxy-control
>> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-**graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.**
>> x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-**proxy-control-319.17
>> mv: cannot stat
>> `/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/**nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-**
>> 155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-**cuda-proxy-control':
>> No such file or directory
>> error: Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.**FWJrY3
>> (%install)
>>
>>
>> RPM build errors:
>> InstallSourcePackage at: psm.c:244: Header V4 DSA/SHA1
>> Signature, key ID 5549a96e: NOKEY
>> user roma does not exist - using root
>> group roma does not exist - using root
>> user roma does not exist - using root
>> group roma does not exist - using root
>> user roma does not exist - using root
>> group roma does not exist - using root
>> Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.**FWJrY3 (%install)
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Milorad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
>> DCC - UFRJ
>>
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Thanks for that . I have commented the lines in the Spec file as per :
>
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**installer
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**uninstall
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**settings %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-
> **settings-%{version}
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**xconfig %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-*
> *xconfig-%{version}
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**bug-report.sh
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**bug-report-%{version}.sh
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**smi %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**
> smi-%{version}
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**debugdump
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**debugdump-%{version}
> #mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**cuda-proxy-control
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**cuda-proxy-control-%{version}
> #mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**cuda-proxy-server
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-**cuda-proxy-server-%{version}
>
>
> That worked , and the compilation process continued , until we hit this :
>
>
> Processing files: nvidia-graphics319.17-devel-**319.17-155.el6.x86_64
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libOpenCL.so.1()(64bit)
> libcuda.so.1()(64bit) libnvcuvid.so.1()(64bit) libnvidia-cfg.so.1()(64bit)
> libnvidia-encode.so.1()(64bit) libnvidia-ml.so.1()(64bit)
> libvdpau.so.1()(64bit)
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-**graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.**x86_64
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-**control
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-**server
> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-**control
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-**server
> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Milorad
>



--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ

On 07/05/13 23:13, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> This is easy. There are three new files
> not listed in the package yet.
>
> I will try to fix the spec ...
>
>
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, O&M Ugarcina <mo.ucina@gmail.com
> <mailto:mo.ucina@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/05/13 23:20, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
> This is a renaming Axel created for avoiding conflicts with
> previous versions
> (the files were originally un-versioned).
>
> Maybe nvidia fixed this issue and the renaming is no longer
> necessary.
> Try commenting these two lines and see what happens...
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:41 AM, O&M Ugarcina
> <mo.ucina@gmail.com <mailto:mo.ucina@gmail.com>
> <mailto:mo.ucina@gmail.com <mailto:mo.ucina@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> On 04/05/13 17:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
>
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have
> some new features , would like to try it out . Can you
> please
> package up a src rpm when you have some spare time .
> Thanks much .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>
> Hello ,
>
> I have downloaded the src rpm and have tried compiling .
> There is
> a compilation issue :
>
> + mv
>
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control
>
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control-319.17
> mv: cannot stat
>
> `/root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64/usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control':
> No such file or directory
> error: Bad exit status from
> /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.FWJrY3 (%install)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> InstallSourcePackage at: psm.c:244: Header V4 DSA/SHA1
> Signature, key ID 5549a96e: NOKEY
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> user roma does not exist - using root
> group roma does not exist - using root
> Bad exit status from /root/redhat/tmp/rpm-tmp.FWJrY3
> (%install)
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
> DCC - UFRJ
>
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Thanks for that . I have commented the lines in the Spec file as per :
>
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-installer
> rm -f %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-uninstall
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-settings
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-settings-%{version}
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-xconfig
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-xconfig-%{version}
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-bug-report.sh
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-bug-report-%{version}.sh
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-smi
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-smi-%{version}
> mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-debugdump
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-debugdump-%{version}
> #mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-control-%{version}
> #mv %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/nvidia-cuda-proxy-server-%{version}
>
>
> That worked , and the compilation process continued , until we hit
> this :
>
>
> Processing files: nvidia-graphics319.17-devel-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> Requires: libGL.so.1()(64bit) libOpenCL.so.1()(64bit)
> libcuda.so.1()(64bit) libnvcuvid.so.1()(64bit)
> libnvidia-cfg.so.1()(64bit) libnvidia-encode.so.1()(64bit)
> libnvidia-ml.so.1()(64bit) libvdpau.so.1()(64bit)
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Milorad
>
>
>
>
> --
> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
> DCC - UFRJ
Any Luck ?

Best Regards
Milorad

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

On 04/05/13 08:20, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
> features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a src
> rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>

Hi: I don't really like doing this, but are you aware of:

kmod-nvidia-319.17-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm 09-May-2013 15:33 3.7M

and dependencies, available from mirrors listed here:

http://elrepo.org/tiki/Download

I don't have hardware that can use this, and I don't know quite how it
would play with other ATrpms-based stuff, but you might find it worth
investigating.

Cheers,

John P



_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

]

> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
>> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
>> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
>> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>>
>>
>> RPM build errors:
>> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
>> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
>> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>>
>

> Any Luck ?
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>


I fixed the package:

http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.fc17.src.rpm

Should compile just fine.

By the way, Axel told me he will be back soon ...

--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ

On 15/05/13 09:19, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
>
> ]
>
> /root/redhat/BUILDROOT/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.el6.x86_64
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-control
> /usr/bin/nvidia-cuda-mps-server
> /usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
>
> Any Luck ?
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
>
>
>
> I fixed the package:
>
> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.fc17.src.rpm
> <http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/nvidia-graphics319.17-319.17-155.fc17.src.rpm>
>
>
> Should compile just fine.
>
> By the way, Axel told me he will be back soon ...
>
> --
> Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
> LCG - UFRJ
Hello Paulo,

Hey Thats great news , I was beginning to worry that he had stopped
working on atrpms .

I have compiled the src rpm , and compiled fine . When I tried to
install it the kernel module complained that it was missing dependency
/usr/sbin/depmod . This is strange since my depmod is in /sbin/depmod .
SO I just forced it in and all went in . I am testing the driver at the
moment and everything seems to be working well . I will keep an eye on
it to see if there are any issues .

Best Regards
Milorad

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Hi,

all nvidia bits are fresh now for all distros (actually some legacy
drivers like 71.86.15 and 96.43.23 do not build anymore on newer
kernels, so that's not 100% true, but probably few people use that old
hardware on Fedora 18 or 17).

Thanks for your patience!!!

On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 05:20:57PM +1000, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
> Hello Paulo,
>
> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
> features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a
> src rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>
> Best Regards
> Milorad
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Please check permissions on a couple files:

$ rsync --timeout=300 --stats --human-readable --human-readable --archive --no-perms --no-owner --hard-links --partial --max-delete=2000 --exclude=repoview/ --exclude=ppc/ --exclude=ppc64/ --exclude=*/bleeding/* dl.atrpms.net::dl.atrpms.net/el[56]*-{i386,x86_64} /local/repo/atrpms

rsync: send_files failed to open "/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm" (in dl.atrpms.net): Permission denied (13)
rsync: send_files failed to open "/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.centos.plus-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm" (in dl.atrpms.net): Permission denied (13)



On 05/17/2013 01:20 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all nvidia bits are fresh now for all distros (actually some legacy
> drivers like 71.86.15 and 96.43.23 do not build anymore on newer
> kernels, so that's not 100% true, but probably few people use that old
> hardware on Fedora 18 or 17).
>
> Thanks for your patience!!!
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 05:20:57PM +1000, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
>> Hello Paulo,
>>
>> Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
>> features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a
>> src rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Milorad

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Thanks for the note - Paulo already found out that these files were
broken and need to be rebuilt.

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 10:45:42AM -0400, Chris Schanzle wrote:
> Please check permissions on a couple files:
>
> $ rsync --timeout=300 --stats --human-readable --human-readable --archive --no-perms --no-owner --hard-links --partial --max-delete=2000 --exclude=repoview/ --exclude=ppc/ --exclude=ppc64/ --exclude=*/bleeding/* dl.atrpms.net::dl.atrpms.net/el[56]*-{i386,x86_64} /local/repo/atrpms
>
> rsync: send_files failed to open "/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm" (in dl.atrpms.net): Permission denied (13)
> rsync: send_files failed to open "/el6-x86_64/atrpms/stable/nvidia-graphics319.17-kmdl-2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.centos.plus-319.17-155.el6.x86_64.rpm" (in dl.atrpms.net): Permission denied (13)
>
>
>
> On 05/17/2013 01:20 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >all nvidia bits are fresh now for all distros (actually some legacy
> >drivers like 71.86.15 and 96.43.23 do not build anymore on newer
> >kernels, so that's not 100% true, but probably few people use that old
> >hardware on Fedora 18 or 17).
> >
> >Thanks for your patience!!!
> >
> >On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 05:20:57PM +1000, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
> >>Hello Paulo,
> >>
> >>Looks like we have a new NVIDIA driver out . Seems to have some new
> >>features , would like to try it out . Can you please package up a
> >>src rpm when you have some spare time . Thanks much .
> >>
> >>Best Regards
> >>Milorad
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>

--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users