Mailing List Archive: ATrpms Packages for Fedora 17

ATrpms Packages for Fedora 17

May 17, 2012, 5:10 PM

Post #1 of 3 (1252 views)

Hi Axel,

Just curious about the status of ATrpms packages for Fedora 17. Using
'preupgrade' I upgraded my work F17 station. When that was complete I ran
a 'yum update', which choked badly, complaining about conflicts with
several ATrpms packages. To temporarily get around this I had to disable
the atrpms repo. In looking at a web directory listing of the repo it
appears that the *newest* packages for F17 go back to November of last
year. I know Fedora 17 is in beta status at the moment, but its release is
only about a week away. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like the repo has
been kept up to date better for past Fedora releases. Someone had posted
to the list a few weeks back about MythTV packages for F17 and I believe
you said there were compile issues which had fixes that hadn't been
committed yet. Are there similar issues for other package or perhaps I'm
just missing something?

As as always I appreciate your repo and all you do to support it.

Thanks,
John

Re: ATrpms Packages for Fedora 17 [ In reply to ]

Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

May 18, 2012, 8:41 AM

Post #2 of 3 (1189 views)

Permalink

Hi John,

I've been building F17 packages for quite a while and thought they
were being exported to the web site. I'll fix that right away, so you
can see them, but they will be all rebuilt in the next days against
the GA. If you find a bug in the current packages chances are that it
will still be there with the final rebuild, though.

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:10:11PM -0400, John Welch wrote:
> Hi Axel,
>
> Just curious about the status of ATrpms packages for Fedora 17. Using
> 'preupgrade' I upgraded my work F17 station. When that was complete I ran
> a 'yum update', which choked badly, complaining about conflicts with
> several ATrpms packages. To temporarily get around this I had to disable
> the atrpms repo. In looking at a web directory listing of the repo it
> appears that the *newest* packages for F17 go back to November of last
> year. I know Fedora 17 is in beta status at the moment, but its release is
> only about a week away. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like the repo has
> been kept up to date better for past Fedora releases. Someone had posted
> to the list a few weeks back about MythTV packages for F17 and I believe
> you said there were compile issues which had fixes that hadn't been
> committed yet. Are there similar issues for other package or perhaps I'm
> just missing something?
>
> As as always I appreciate your repo and all you do to support it.
>
> Thanks,
> John

> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Re: ATrpms Packages for Fedora 17 [ In reply to ]

jrw3319 at gmail

May 18, 2012, 8:56 AM

Post #3 of 3 (1187 views)

Permalink

Thanks Axel! I'll keep an eye out for the rebuilt packages and if I run
into any issues I'll post back.

John

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> I've been building F17 packages for quite a while and thought they
> were being exported to the web site. I'll fix that right away, so you
> can see them, but they will be all rebuilt in the next days against
> the GA. If you find a bug in the current packages chances are that it
> will still be there with the final rebuild, though.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:10:11PM -0400, John Welch wrote:
> > Hi Axel,
> >
> > Just curious about the status of ATrpms packages for Fedora 17. Using
> > 'preupgrade' I upgraded my work F17 station. When that was complete I
> ran
> > a 'yum update', which choked badly, complaining about conflicts with
> > several ATrpms packages. To temporarily get around this I had to disable
> > the atrpms repo. In looking at a web directory listing of the repo it
> > appears that the *newest* packages for F17 go back to November of last
> > year. I know Fedora 17 is in beta status at the moment, but its release
> is
> > only about a week away. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like the repo has
> > been kept up to date better for past Fedora releases. Someone had posted
> > to the list a few weeks back about MythTV packages for F17 and I believe
> > you said there were compile issues which had fixes that hadn't been
> > committed yet. Are there similar issues for other package or perhaps I'm
> > just missing something?
> >
> > As as always I appreciate your repo and all you do to support it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrpms-users mailing list
> > atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>
>
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>