On 29/09/2013 2:33 PM, Stephen Collier wrote:
> On 29/09/2013 2:18 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> do you want to update ATrpms' qt47 to qt48? The qt47 is a Fedora
>> backport you can diff the spec file to see what was done. Thanks!!! :-)
>>
>> Stephen Collier <judithc@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>> On 26/09/2013 10:47 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Stephen Collier
>>>> <judithc@bigpond.net.au <mailto:judithc@bigpond.net.au>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2013 2:06 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I will respin a 0.26.1 with all current fixes and a 0.27 with
>>>> the few
>>>> fixes that are already in the git.
>>>>
>>>> Any chance of spinning 0.27 for EL6?
>>>>
>>>> I'm doing some test compiles using epel qt5.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm assuming you already know the pitfalls of qt5 for mythtv?
>>>>
>>>> For those that don't, I was experimenting with this for RPM Fusion
>>>> EPEL 6 packages but there's a couple of components/plugins that won't
>>>> build with qt5 and even if it does, it's not guaranteed to work.
>>> Until
>>>> someone has time to do the full port, it's not supported upstream so
>>>> unless you have a patch, any bugs you file will probably be
>>> ignored...
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>> I now have qt48 working with the stcok atrpm 0.26.1 rpms let me know if
>>>
>>> you want to try them.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
> Axel,
>
> I started with the F19 spec and then backported everything from
> qt47.spec to maintain a seperate base like was done with qt47 to
> maintain the stock qt4.6. I'm still testing - recompiling
> mythtv-0.26.1 now as it doen't play nicely changing qt versions - the
> mysql connection isn't working properly. I'll let you know if the
> recompiled 0.26 is OK.
>
> Then I'll move to 0.27 and test.
>
> The upgrade to qt48 is not smooth as qt47 has phonon compiled in and
> qt48 doesn't. The only way I could get the upgrade was to rpm -e
> --nodeps qt47-webkit qt47-mysql. then yum install qt48 qt48-mysql
> qt48-webkit. I may have to make an rpm for phonon but I hope not as
> fedora are only using a qt4.6 based one so the phonon built into qt4.6
> may be OK.
>
> Cheers
> Stephen
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>
It is now working fully with recompile. I'll rebuild 0.27 tomorrow and test.
_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
> On 29/09/2013 2:18 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> do you want to update ATrpms' qt47 to qt48? The qt47 is a Fedora
>> backport you can diff the spec file to see what was done. Thanks!!! :-)
>>
>> Stephen Collier <judithc@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>> On 26/09/2013 10:47 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Stephen Collier
>>>> <judithc@bigpond.net.au <mailto:judithc@bigpond.net.au>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 24/09/2013 2:06 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I will respin a 0.26.1 with all current fixes and a 0.27 with
>>>> the few
>>>> fixes that are already in the git.
>>>>
>>>> Any chance of spinning 0.27 for EL6?
>>>>
>>>> I'm doing some test compiles using epel qt5.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm assuming you already know the pitfalls of qt5 for mythtv?
>>>>
>>>> For those that don't, I was experimenting with this for RPM Fusion
>>>> EPEL 6 packages but there's a couple of components/plugins that won't
>>>> build with qt5 and even if it does, it's not guaranteed to work.
>>> Until
>>>> someone has time to do the full port, it's not supported upstream so
>>>> unless you have a patch, any bugs you file will probably be
>>> ignored...
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>> I now have qt48 working with the stcok atrpm 0.26.1 rpms let me know if
>>>
>>> you want to try them.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
> Axel,
>
> I started with the F19 spec and then backported everything from
> qt47.spec to maintain a seperate base like was done with qt47 to
> maintain the stock qt4.6. I'm still testing - recompiling
> mythtv-0.26.1 now as it doen't play nicely changing qt versions - the
> mysql connection isn't working properly. I'll let you know if the
> recompiled 0.26 is OK.
>
> Then I'll move to 0.27 and test.
>
> The upgrade to qt48 is not smooth as qt47 has phonon compiled in and
> qt48 doesn't. The only way I could get the upgrade was to rpm -e
> --nodeps qt47-webkit qt47-mysql. then yum install qt48 qt48-mysql
> qt48-webkit. I may have to make an rpm for phonon but I hope not as
> fedora are only using a qt4.6 based one so the phonon built into qt4.6
> may be OK.
>
> Cheers
> Stephen
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users@atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>
It is now working fully with recompile. I'll rebuild 0.27 tomorrow and test.
_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel