Mailing List Archive

cvs commit: httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts name-based.html
fanf 00/10/19 11:54:12

Modified: htdocs/manual/vhosts name-based.html
Log:
Be more emphatic about the number of browsers that don't do Host: headers.
We love you, IE2.

Revision Changes Path
1.14 +6 -6 httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html

Index: name-based.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/vhosts/name-based.html,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- name-based.html 2000/09/13 20:14:47 1.13
+++ name-based.html 2000/10/19 18:54:11 1.14
@@ -33,12 +33,12 @@
what name it is being addressed as. Apache 1.1 and later support this
approach as well as the old IP-address-per-hostname method.</P>

-<P>The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a
-practically unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and
-requires no additional hardware or software.
-The main disadvantage is that the client must support this part of the
-protocol. Almost all browsers do, but there are still small numbers of
-old browsers in use who do not. This can cause problems, although a possible
+<P>The benefits of using the name-based virtual hosts is a practically
+unlimited number of servers, ease of configuration and use, and
+requires no additional hardware or software. The main disadvantage is
+that the client must support this part of the protocol. Almost all
+browsers do, but there are still tiny numbers of very old browsers in
+use which do not. This can cause problems, although a possible
solution is addressed below.</P>

<H2>Using name-based virtual hosts</H2>