>
> BTW, I think B59 (not in 0.5) might have a bug in it. I noticed
> a cached page that had includes which wasn't formatted properly.
> I'll have to put B59 back in to test to see if it was to blame.
there's certainly a compatibility problem..
<!--#config timefmt="(last updated <i>%a, %e %b %y %H:%M %Z</i>)" -->
comes out as
(last updated <i>Fri, 7 Apr 95 10:15 MDT</i>)
i.e. my <i>s are being escaped.
"Correcting" HTML is not the job of the server, it's the author's job.
robh
> BTW, I think B59 (not in 0.5) might have a bug in it. I noticed
> a cached page that had includes which wasn't formatted properly.
> I'll have to put B59 back in to test to see if it was to blame.
there's certainly a compatibility problem..
<!--#config timefmt="(last updated <i>%a, %e %b %y %H:%M %Z</i>)" -->
comes out as
(last updated <i>Fri, 7 Apr 95 10:15 MDT</i>)
i.e. my <i>s are being escaped.
"Correcting" HTML is not the job of the server, it's the author's job.
robh