Mailing List Archive

Vote on 0.8.16/1.0
Re: Vote on 0.8.16/1.0 [ In reply to ]
On Fri, 27 Oct 1995, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> +1 34_htgroup.0.8.15.patch
> +1 34a_htgroup.rst.0.8.15.patch

Uh...... did you actually test these? +1's *should* require that they
have actually been tested or at least inspected by someone familiar with
the code. +1 should not just mean "good idea".

Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Re: Vote on 0.8.16/1.0 [ In reply to ]
Re: Vote on 0.8.16/1.0 [ In reply to ]
On Mon, 30 Oct 1995, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Oct 1995, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > > +1 34_htgroup.0.8.15.patch
> > > +1 34a_htgroup.rst.0.8.15.patch
> >
> > Uh...... did you actually test these? +1's *should* require that they
> > have actually been tested or at least inspected by someone familiar with
> > the code. +1 should not just mean "good idea".
>
> Yep... tested.

I thought these two were exclusive.

Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Re: Vote on 0.8.16/1.0 [ In reply to ]