Bad PR...
c.i.w.s.u
Daniel L. Smith wrote:
>
> In <KHERA.95Oct9142051@kci.kciLink.com> khera@kciLink.com (Vivek Khera) writes:
>
> > >>>>> "DM" == Davide Migliavacca <davide.migliavacca@inferentia.it> writes:
>
> > DM> To anybody "experienced" with Apache 0.8.x: I am going to replace
> > DM> a working site's server software with Apache. Should I use 0.6 or
> > DM> is 0.8 stable (in your experience)?
>
> > I find Apache 0.8.14 to be quite stable. I run a production
>
> Same here, except for the fact that even 0.8.14 gets confused
> about passwords on a per-directory basis, and won't consistently authenticate
> known-good passwords. Switching to NCSA 1.4.2 quickly cleared this up.
> I'll go back to Apache when I can reliably block off a restricted cgi
> directory to authenticated users.
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel L Smith Snapper's Mate, Sophia's Dad, Hoopy Frood
> dls@crl.com dls@wais.com P.O. 613, Sausalito, CA, 94966
c.i.w.s.u
Daniel L. Smith wrote:
>
> In <KHERA.95Oct9142051@kci.kciLink.com> khera@kciLink.com (Vivek Khera) writes:
>
> > >>>>> "DM" == Davide Migliavacca <davide.migliavacca@inferentia.it> writes:
>
> > DM> To anybody "experienced" with Apache 0.8.x: I am going to replace
> > DM> a working site's server software with Apache. Should I use 0.6 or
> > DM> is 0.8 stable (in your experience)?
>
> > I find Apache 0.8.14 to be quite stable. I run a production
>
> Same here, except for the fact that even 0.8.14 gets confused
> about passwords on a per-directory basis, and won't consistently authenticate
> known-good passwords. Switching to NCSA 1.4.2 quickly cleared this up.
> I'll go back to Apache when I can reliably block off a restricted cgi
> directory to authenticated users.
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel L Smith Snapper's Mate, Sophia's Dad, Hoopy Frood
> dls@crl.com dls@wais.com P.O. 613, Sausalito, CA, 94966