Mailing List Archive: votes

votes

Sep 27, 1995, 8:07 AM

Post #1 of 4 (237 views)

Since no one else has steped forward to take the votes, I'll do it again
if no one has any objections.

Right now we have the following patches:

01_http_config.0.8.14.patch
02_DBMGroupCoreFix.0.8.14.patch
04a_ExtraPath.0.8.14.patch
05_NoKill.0.8.14.patch
06_SCODocFix.0.8.14.patch
07_SocketMemLeak.0.8.14.patch
08_license.0.8.14.patch
09_HP_comment.0.8.14.patch
10_mutual-failure.0.8.14.patch
11_fd_removal.0.8.14.patch

03 was withdrawn, 08 is documentation only ( copyright stuff )

48 hours for the votes deadline... get it in fast, get it in clean.

<Aram>
--
Aram W. Mirzadeh, MIS Manager, Qosina Corporation
http://www.qosina.com/~awm/, awm@qosina.com
Apache httpd server team http://www.apache.org

Re: votes [ In reply to ]

hartill at ooo

Sep 27, 1995, 9:16 AM

Post #2 of 4 (237 views)

Permalink

> Since no one else has steped forward to take the votes, I'll do it again
> if no one has any objections.

I was thinking of volunteering on the understanding that the vote session
would be about 2 weeks, and the result would be Apache 1.0

If people prefer that option, speak now.

> 48 hours for the votes deadline... get it in fast, get it in clean.

:-|

Re: votes [ In reply to ]

ben at gonzo

Sep 27, 1995, 3:53 PM

Post #3 of 4 (229 views)

Permalink

> Since no one else has steped forward to take the votes, I'll do it again
> if no one has any objections.
>
> Right now we have the following patches:
>
> 01_http_config.0.8.14.patch
> 02_DBMGroupCoreFix.0.8.14.patch

I have two problems with this one. One is I don't understand what it is
supposed to do, and the other is that it doesn't fix (or generate) the
accompanying documentation, which, in my view anyway, should be a requirement
for any functionality change.

> 04a_ExtraPath.0.8.14.patch
> 05_NoKill.0.8.14.patch
> 06_SCODocFix.0.8.14.patch
> 07_SocketMemLeak.0.8.14.patch
> 08_license.0.8.14.patch
> 09_HP_comment.0.8.14.patch
> 10_mutual-failure.0.8.14.patch
> 11_fd_removal.0.8.14.patch

And this one looks a little rash. One must assume that there is a version
of Linux which requires these defines.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
Ben Laurie Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant Fax: +44 (181) 994 6472
and Technical Director Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
A.L. Digital Ltd,
London, England.

Re: votes [ In reply to ]

M.J.Cox at bradford

Sep 28, 1995, 12:37 AM

Post #4 of 4 (233 views)

Permalink

On Wed, 27 Sep 1995, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > 02_DBMGroupCoreFix.0.8.14.patch
>
> I have two problems with this one. One is I don't understand what it is
> supposed to do, and the other is that it doesn't fix (or generate) the
> accompanying documentation, which, in my view anyway, should be a requirement
> for any functionality change.

It fixes a core dump bug sent to apache-bugs. There is no
documentation for the use of DBM group files anyway. This patch doesn't
alter any existing functionality.

Mark
Mark J Cox, mark@telescope.org -- URL:http://www.telescope.org/mark.html
University of Bradford, England ---------- tel +44.1274.384070/fax 391333