Mailing List Archive

Virtual IP on Solaris (fwd) [Rob Hartill <hartill@hyperreal.com>] (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@hyperreal.com>
Message-Id: <199507112045.NAA08099@taz.hyperreal.com>
Subject: Virtual IP on Solaris (fwd)
To: new-httpd@mail.apache.org
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 13:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: apache-bugs@mail.apache.org


Someone help this guy...

wasn't BindAddress obsoleted ? (it's still in the documentation)

Forwarded message:
> From cvmiller@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu Fri Jul 7 19:00:25 1995
> Message-Id: <9507080201.AA16974@makaha.mic.Hawaii.Edu>
> Date: Sat, 08 Jul 95 01:59:02 1000
> From: Craig Miller <cvmiller@uhunix.uhcc.hawaii.edu>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> To: apache-bugs@mail.apache.org, webmaster@makaha.mic.hawaii.edu,
> webmaster@mana.htdc.org
> Subject: Virtual IP on Solaris
> X-Url: http://www.apache.org/docs/FAQ.html#support
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Aloha,
>
> We are trying to run Apache as a virtual server on our Solaris (Sparc
> 20). Apache is still responding to both IP on this machine. It is
> possible we have not defined the second IP correctly. Here is the
> ifconfig:
>
> mana% ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 8232
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
> le0: flags=863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 167.216.1.2 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 167.216.1.127
> le0:1: flags=843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> inet 167.216.1.3 netmask ffffff80 broadcast 167.216.1.127
>
> and the httpd.conf looks like this:
> # ServerType is either inetd, or standalone.
>
> ServerType standalone
>
> # If you are running from inetd, go to "ServerAdmin".
>
> # Port: The port the standalone listens to. For ports < 1023, you will
> # need httpd to be run as root initially.
>
> Port 8080
>
> # BindAddress: binds server to a specific IP address
> # BindAddress 167.216.1.3
> BindAddress www.hawaii.org
>
> Are there any obvious things that I am missing?
>
> Craig...
>
>
>
>
Re: Virtual IP on Solaris (fwd) [Rob Hartill <hartill@hyperreal.com>] (fwd) [ In reply to ]
From: Rob Hartill <hartill@hyperreal.com>
Message-Id: <199507112045.NAA08099@taz.hyperreal.com>
Subject: Virtual IP on Solaris (fwd)

Someone help this guy...

wasn't BindAddress obsoleted ? (it's still in the documentation)

For most purposes, <VirtualHost> trumps BindAddress, and that's true
for even more purposes with Shambhala (with which it's no longer the
case, for instance, that you need to run multiple server processes to
give each virtual host its own set of Aliases). However, even after
that, there's still one purpose which a few people might have for
sticking with BindAddress, which is that it allows different virtual
servers to run with different uids.

rst