DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8130>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8130
Won't run on Solaris
jwoolley@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-04-15 21:56 -------
Actually, GNU binutils' _absence_ is most likely to blame. This is a duplicate of PR8038,
please see that report.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8038 ***
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8130>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8130
Won't run on Solaris
jwoolley@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From jwoolley@apache.org 2002-04-15 21:56 -------
Actually, GNU binutils' _absence_ is most likely to blame. This is a duplicate of PR8038,
please see that report.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 8038 ***