Hi folks,
And congrats for the release of 2.0 -- this is really cool stuff.
While looking through Xen's features, I kept wondering if it's
possible to have a common kernel binary that would work with/without
Xen. In other words, to dynamically determine if it's running
under Xen, and behave appropriately.
And hence my questions:
-- is this possible to begin with?
-- has anyone looked into it already?
-- what would be the implications?
-- any significant performance problems?
Well, thank you for your time, and keep up the excellent work
on this amazing project!
--
Dimi.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
And congrats for the release of 2.0 -- this is really cool stuff.
While looking through Xen's features, I kept wondering if it's
possible to have a common kernel binary that would work with/without
Xen. In other words, to dynamically determine if it's running
under Xen, and behave appropriately.
And hence my questions:
-- is this possible to begin with?
-- has anyone looked into it already?
-- what would be the implications?
-- any significant performance problems?
Well, thank you for your time, and keep up the excellent work
on this amazing project!
--
Dimi.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel